Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi i have a question... my final has got a very low grade and I can't explain it...I guess that the professor did some mistakes...
One question that weight a lot of points was about ethernet... the professor asked why ethernet is used only in local area network? resuming i wrote that ethernet is used only in LAN because it is shared and so for big network there could be a lot problem in using the shared channel.. for istance using protocol such as CSMA/CD, if a big network has a lot of hosts, they could wait a long time before sending...
is it right or am I wrong?
Last edited by magodiafano; 12-25-2010 at 02:44 PM.
The first thing I thought of was cost. I've always wanted to implement fiber on my home network but fiber cards and switches are quite a bit more expensive than ethernet.
It is a goofy question. Lan is a statement that may be used to oppose wan (but not stated). In most cases Ethernet is not used to transmit over longer distances directly. CSU, T-1, wireless or fiber dedicated formats tend to be used over longer distances.
but the fact that ethernet is shared and so creates a lot of problems in a large network is completely wrong?
Pretty much so. Ethernet is really no longer a shared environment. It was when 10Base2, 10Base5 and 10BaseT hubs were the prevalent hardware comprising a network. But with the advent of switches (where each port has a built-in bridge and therefore is a separate collision domain) you'd be hard pressed to find a collision anywhere in your network.
andrewthomas and jefro's comments on distance I think are the right answer.
(Ethernet is fast and reliable but has distance limitations. Ethernet won out over token ring on the cost issue, and over fiber, too as LVsFINEST mentioned but that wasn't the question.)
Last edited by tommylovell; 12-27-2010 at 04:48 PM.
Copper based Ethernet used locally because it can only go 90-100m. But fiber based Ethernet can go much further based on fiber quality and module used, up to ~70km, no longer making it local... but it's still Ethernet.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.