Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
09-15-2016, 08:48 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Tokyo
Distribution: Mostly Ubuntu and Centos
Posts: 6,316
|
What to do when a public IP address can't be reached
While I am aware that this is not strictly a Linux Networking questions, I hope somebody can help with advice how to troubleshoot my problem.
I am unable to access a certain IP address, 173.205.188.47. In principle it is reachable, as evidenced by the use of tools like https://www.dotcom-tools.com/ping-test.aspx, but access from home fails. My ISP is Yahoo Broadband, one of the largest if not the largest provider in Japan. I need to call their support but want to gather as much information as possible before I do so (admittedly the prospect of a Japanese support call makes me shrink away a little).
ping 173.205.188.47 just times out.
Traceroute (see below) seems to indicate that the packet makes good progress into the servers of NTT, the former telephony monopolist and now probably largest infrastructure provider in these parts, then seems to get stuck in inforelay.net.
How should I interpret this? Are there other tools I could use, local or web-based?
Code:
$ traceroute 173.205.188.47
traceroute to 173.205.188.47 (173.205.188.47), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 router.home (192.168.1.1) 0.593 ms 0.711 ms 0.400 ms
2 softbank<redacted>.bbtec.net (<redacted>) 15.615 ms 15.806 ms 16.493 ms
3 10.206.5.78 (10.206.5.78) 18.016 ms 18.466 ms 19.476 ms
4 10.206.2.174 (10.206.2.174) 19.601 ms 20.343 ms 21.066 ms
5 10.0.131.105 (10.0.131.105) 21.757 ms 21.727 ms 22.451 ms
6 10.0.61.69 (10.0.61.69) 32.099 ms 19.590 ms 19.749 ms
7 10.0.207.49 (10.0.207.49) 20.403 ms 16.602 ms 19.932 ms
8 10.9.195.2 (10.9.195.2) 22.322 ms 18.786 ms 21.961 ms
9 ae-12.r00.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (203.105.72.81) 18.919 ms 19.627 ms 19.820 ms
10 ae-8.r31.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.190) 21.278 ms 21.948 ms 22.652 ms
11 ae-4.r23.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.193) 130.221 ms 125.016 ms 125.525 ms
12 ae-2.r01.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.107) 127.281 ms 128.845 ms 128.561 ms
13 ae-0.inforelay-online-systems.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.242.180.166) 128.782 ms 129.433 ms 124.512 ms
14 er1.lax2.inforelay.net (67.208.82.78) 127.080 ms 67.208.82.6 (67.208.82.6) 126.141 ms 129.317 ms
15 67.208.84.214 (67.208.84.214) 127.506 ms 67.208.84.210 (67.208.84.210) 129.916 ms 131.955 ms
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *
|
|
|
09-15-2016, 09:21 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,736
|
I just pinged the site successfully. My traceroute was similar to yours.
The site resolves in my browser with the page header "Welcome to HPE Helion Documentation," and seems fully functional.
Sites do go down. They hiccough. They get DDoSed. Servers fail. Stuff happens.
Grab your towel (per The Hitchhiker's Guide), don't panic, and try again later.
Last edited by frankbell; 09-15-2016 at 09:33 PM.
|
|
|
09-15-2016, 09:33 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Sage
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~amd64
Posts: 7,675
Rep:
|
TCP gets thru where UDP gets blocked.
Code:
traceroute -T 173.205.188.47
traceroute to 173.205.188.47 (173.205.188.47), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 172.20.0.1 (172.20.0.1) 11.127 ms 11.112 ms 11.107 ms
2 10.131.128.1 (10.131.128.1) 20.008 ms 20.011 ms 20.008 ms
3 24.248.104.84 (24.248.104.84) 32.934 ms 32.949 ms 32.950 ms
4 70.169.88.34 (70.169.88.34) 32.936 ms 32.935 ms 37.070 ms
5 dalsbprj01-ae1.0.rd.dl.cox.net (68.1.2.109) 55.771 ms 55.765 ms 55.733 ms
6 ae-12.r08.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.194.173) 64.776 ms 48.916 ms 52.212 ms
7 ae-8.r22.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.167) 52.180 ms 21.486 ms 30.675 ms
8 ae-5.r22.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.7.69) 62.828 ms 62.794 ms 62.807 ms
9 ae-1.r01.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.123) 58.023 ms 73.664 ms 67.030 ms
10 ae-0.inforelay-online-systems.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.242.180.166) 82.458 ms 82.455 ms 84.612 ms
11 er1.lax2.inforelay.net (67.208.82.78) 84.607 ms 67.208.82.6 (67.208.82.6) 82.386 ms 64.700 ms
12 67.208.84.210 (67.208.84.210) 60.077 ms 67.208.84.214 (67.208.84.214) 60.069 ms 69.997 ms
13 173.205.188.47 (173.205.188.47) 69.982 ms 54.604 ms 50.833 ms
14 173.205.188.47 (173.205.188.47) 57.314 ms 61.312 ms 54.829 ms
Last edited by Emerson; 09-15-2016 at 09:35 PM.
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 01:35 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Tokyo
Distribution: Mostly Ubuntu and Centos
Posts: 6,316
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell
seems fully functional.
|
It is. The site contains the documentation of HPE's Helion products and had better be up at all times. I forgot to mention that I can access it via a proxy (but I haven't found a free proxy that makes that process painless enough).
It's just not reachable from here, and my baby-level networking skills are insufficient to understand what's wrong. How can I find out?
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 01:39 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Tokyo
Distribution: Mostly Ubuntu and Centos
Posts: 6,316
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emerson
TCP gets thru where UDP gets blocked.
Code:
traceroute -T 173.205.188.47
traceroute to 173.205.188.47 (173.205.188.47), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
(...)
10 ae-0.inforelay-online-systems.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.242.180.166) 82.458 ms 82.455 ms 84.612 ms
11 er1.lax2.inforelay.net (67.208.82.78) 84.607 ms 67.208.82.6 (67.208.82.6) 82.386 ms 64.700 ms
12 67.208.84.210 (67.208.84.210) 60.077 ms 67.208.84.214 (67.208.84.214) 60.069 ms 69.997 ms
13 173.205.188.47 (173.205.188.47) 69.982 ms 54.604 ms 50.833 ms
14 173.205.188.47 (173.205.188.47) 57.314 ms 61.312 ms 54.829 ms
|
Funny, my packets goes through the exact same routers number 10,11 and 12 as your packets. After that, it seems to disappear.
Code:
13 ae-0.inforelay-online-systems.lsanca07.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.242.180.166) 123.771 ms 123.149 ms 124.482 ms
14 er1.lax2.inforelay.net (67.208.82.78) 119.528 ms 67.208.82.6 (67.208.82.6) 127.826 ms 128.371 ms
15 67.208.84.210 (67.208.84.210) 125.177 ms 67.208.84.214 (67.208.84.214) 127.028 ms 125.993 ms
16 * * *
17 * * *
etc.
What does that mean?
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 06:02 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by berndbausch
It is. The site contains the documentation of HPE's Helion products and had better be up at all times. I forgot to mention that I can access it via a proxy (but I haven't found a free proxy that makes that process painless enough).
It's just not reachable from here, and my baby-level networking skills are insufficient to understand what's wrong. How can I find out?
|
ping failure, is not an absolute indicator of much.
Ping is unreliable as a test.
ICMP packets can be dropped.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/h...173.205.188.47
since there's no DNS A Record on that HP host, I can only assume it if for protection by obfuscation.
ping showing **** does not mean "down" as packets can be dropped. They're called "hops"
Visit the site or test port 80 instead, using
Code:
nc -zv 173.205.188.47 80
anything but ping.
Last edited by Habitual; 09-16-2016 at 06:06 AM.
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 07:38 AM
|
#7
|
LQ Sage
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~amd64
Posts: 7,675
Rep:
|
I was thinking traceroute uses ICMP by default ... it does use UDP. I'm getting thru using ICMP and TCP, only UDP fails.
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 09:20 AM
|
#8
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emerson
I was thinking traceroute uses ICMP by default ... it does use UDP. I'm getting thru using ICMP and TCP, only UDP fails.
|
I'd have to take your word for it.
I just don't think ping is worth spit.
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 06:52 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2012
Location: Washington DC area
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 4,908
|
Sometimes this is just a temporary problem with the routers between you and the target (usually when traceroute starts putting ***, either the ISP disables ICMP OR the router is currently confused/being updated).
ISPs tend to disable ICMP (AT&T does this) to avoid ping floods. Traceroute has alternate methods of tracing (using TCP) that usually work.
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 06:55 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Sage
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~amd64
Posts: 7,675
Rep:
|
It is Windows traceroute that uses ICMP, Linux traceroute seems to default to UDP, although TCP, GRE, ICMP and others are available.
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 11:14 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2015
Posts: 733
Rep:
|
What access do you need to the site? What protocol? Http, ftp, ssh? My point is that you might be asking the wrong question and/or drawing the wrong conclusions.
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 11:15 PM
|
#12
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Tokyo
Distribution: Mostly Ubuntu and Centos
Posts: 6,316
Original Poster
|
Well I pinged the site only after I was unable to reach it via web browser. I also tried nc and telnet. This is hardly a temporary glitch; it has been like this for a week at least.
Habitual's remark
Quote:
there's no DNS A Record on that HP host
|
is very interesting. I can't imagine this site is supposed to be obfuscated; it contains the official documentation of HPE's cloud products. And by the way, I get an A record for the site's name:
Code:
$ dig docs.hpcloud.com
; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9+deb8u4-Raspbian <<>> docs.hpcloud.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41645
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 6, ADDITIONAL: 7
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;docs.hpcloud.com. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
docs.hpcloud.com. 900 IN CNAME docs.hpcloud.net.
docs.hpcloud.net. 900 IN A 173.205.188.47
but not the other way round:
Code:
$ dig 47.188.205.173.in-addr.arpa
; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9+deb8u4-Raspbian <<>> 47.188.205.173.in-addr.arpa
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 7368
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;47.188.205.173.in-addr.arpa. IN A
Is this related to this outage? But why only me, then?
Last edited by berndbausch; 09-16-2016 at 11:18 PM.
Reason: wrong dig command for reverse lookup
|
|
|
09-16-2016, 11:24 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2015
Posts: 733
Rep:
|
Just use a proxy to access it. There are plenty around, pick one and use it until they fix it.
|
|
|
09-17-2016, 07:48 AM
|
#14
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by berndbausch
Habitual's remark
is very interesting. I can't imagine this site is supposed to be obfuscated; it contains the official documentation of HPE's cloud products. And by the way, I get an A record for the site's name:
[code]
$ dig docs.hpcloud.com
|
I meant the result of
Code:
host 173.205.188.47
and no rDNS, my bad.
and I didn't know of any docs.hpcloud.com host.
|
|
|
09-18-2016, 12:44 AM
|
#15
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Tokyo
Distribution: Mostly Ubuntu and Centos
Posts: 6,316
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinndalir
Just use a proxy to access it. There are plenty around, pick one and use it until they fix it.
|
Yes, I guess that will be my fate. I just thought it might be possible to find out what's going on in the plumbing of the global machine.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|