Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
03-29-2010, 11:33 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 7,015
|
What TLD to use for local network.
As it looks like the number of DNS Top Level Domains are just going to proliferate in the near future, what's your guys views on a good one to use locally on an RFC 1918 private network in order to prevent a future name collision issue?
.local is the most obvious one but as that was stolen by Apple for mDNS/rendezvous use it's probably wise to avoid it now.
What do you guys use? Is there a defacto standard for this?
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 12:30 PM
|
#2
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora40
Posts: 6,152
|
AFAIK you can use any names you like on your private LAN, including .local if you so choose.
I just use XXX.home.net
No problems after 10yrs
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 12:33 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Coventry, UK
Distribution: Home: Gentoo x86/amd64, Debian ppc. Work: Ubuntu, SuSe, CentOS
Posts: 343
Rep:
|
I name mine after myself XXX.Bowers.Net
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 02:18 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: /home/teebones
Distribution: sometimes this, sometimes that..
Posts: 502
Rep:
|
could be anything really, even if you would use yahoo.com or google.com :P
but.. then you would have a problem, surfing either of them, since they will route to your own machines :P
(dns records and/or wins e.g. hosted locally)
but it's allowed, it can be done.. it your freedom to do so.
But for saveguides...
.local
.lan
.internal
.<fictional tld here>
is the best way to go, if you would not encounter resolving problems of existing domains you may want to visit.
note: i think you want to use your own dns server for resolving rather than a third party one (e.g. isp dns) right?
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
04-01-2010, 02:27 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 7,015
Original Poster
|
I was just curious what people thought best practice was. As far as I can tell, from reading the replies here and other stuff on the subject it looks like there's no one standard that people are adopting (most seem to still be using .local, so I'll just stick with my invented tld and not worry about it until I hit a problem (if I ever do)
Thank you, to those who responded.
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 07:40 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2010
Posts: 6
Rep:
|
.local is not valid for private lans
All of the above comments are incorrect.
It DOES matter what you call your local domain. .local is a reserved name for mDNS and so should be avoided. You may get a delay in resolving a FQDN with .local in it. Technically it would be invalid for use on a private lan.
Names like .lan or .home are better but the best practice would be to use a genuine registered domain name for both inside and outside your network. Reason being should the domain every become a real internet domain, you would end up in a lot of trouble.
|
|
|
01-09-2014, 03:22 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 509
|
I know this is an old thread, but thought I'd add my 2c too....
Looking at RFC6761 (paragraph 6.2), it would seem that .test would be the best choice if you want to avoid the possibility of future conflicts, and don't want to use a registered domain name.
Any thoughts on / experience with this?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|