LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-04-2013, 02:18 PM   #1
kitek
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 252

Rep: Reputation: 15
What kind of network setup could this have been?


I have obtain two PowerEdge 2800 servers FREE. Nice right! They have a hardware setup that interests me and I am curious of why they may have them setup they way that they are. The servers are labeled Server 1 and Server 2 and they are identical in setup. Of course the hard drives were pulled but they were originally shipped with Windows 2003 Std. PowerEdge servers have 2 built on on 1gb NIC's. But they added two more Dual NIC cards on each server. Making them each have 6 NIC's. These servers came from an Alarm company. I am just curious to why they had them setup this way. Maybe they didn't have a switch? I didn't get to pull these servers myself. My brother does construction and they were left behind by the company when they were demoing the building and of course he knew I may want these and of course I did. I will make them Linux boxes. Does anyone have any idea's of what kind of setup they "might" have been used for? The reason I want to know is it might be something I have not used before and could be useful but I can not think of anything to why they would have so many ports. I assume one server was a backup domain controller I guess. But it seems like over kill of network ports.
 
Old 08-04-2013, 03:11 PM   #2
countrygrrl_ak
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Alaska
Distribution: CentOS, Debian PowerPC, OS X
Posts: 12
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Can only guess

The only reason I can think of right off is to avoid the use of a switch. Thus avoiding any perceived latency issues, or configuration snaffoos? They might have thought avoiding a switch would tighten the security of their network with everything forced to static IP's and no way for an external intruder to tap into the network through an appliance? Think of direct connecting one of the NIC's to say, a SQL server and it's backup server. And another to a domain controller, etc. So one server to another server. Or maybe they had that many inbound lines from their ISP and they put each on it's own WAN connection?

This is all guess work
 
Old 08-04-2013, 03:26 PM   #3
Ser Olmy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,349

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
That many NICs would typically indicate the use of trunking/teaming.

The high number of NICs suggests more than one network segment, teaming nonwithstanding. They may have had a dedicated storage network for iSCSI or AoE. It could also be that the servers were running some sort of High Availability service, with some of the NICs being used for heartbeat signaling between the nodes.

Last edited by Ser Olmy; 08-04-2013 at 03:28 PM.
 
Old 08-05-2013, 09:20 AM   #4
dt64
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2012
Distribution: RHEL5/6, CentOS5/6
Posts: 218

Rep: Reputation: 38
2+2*2 NICs looks like they used to team or bond 2 NICs together for redundancy and connect the server to 3 different networks.
Why they had dedicated networks is hard to say without more background information, but it could possibly be a management network, a production network and a intranet. There are many companies out there building didicated networks for special uses to make sure one can't interfere with the other. Maybe they weren't even using TCP/IP on some of the networks but other protocols.
 
Old 08-08-2013, 12:22 AM   #5
ilesterg
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: München
Distribution: Debian, CentOS/RHEL
Posts: 587

Rep: Reputation: 72
I'd go for teaming the interfaces, which is more likely the more common practice nowadays than connecting to dual WAN interfaces. Teaming+load balancing i guess??
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can I Get Hacked If I Lack Any Kind of Network Connectivity? Gins Linux - General 9 06-15-2009 05:03 PM
Wiring home for network - what kind of wire? tiger.woods Linux - Networking 4 03-11-2009 09:41 PM
what kind of network design is this? cheesewizz Linux - Networking 5 10-09-2008 03:13 AM
Disable any kind of network trasfer athv_gr Linux - Networking 1 09-18-2008 04:34 AM
is there an adverse effect if i have this kind of memory setup? spyghost General 8 01-19-2004 06:01 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration