What filesharing is fastest over ethernet?
I'm looking to strip down and lean out a particular filiesharing technology so that it runs fast as possible over ethernet. What technology is best? NFS, samba, AFS?
Bare in mind that security or other worries are not of any concern... only speed! |
Between linux computers, nfs is by far the fastest, but it does not work with Windows.
I don't know about other network filesystems. |
Quote:
|
NFS is almost totally built into the kernel and super-optimized. The samba project is much more concerned with support for broken Microsoft standards, than speed. (They have done a great job at this) There is no reason to use Samba and broken Microsoft protocols instead of NFS, unless you have to.
|
Run both servers. So if linux to linux is needed then use nfs on it. If going to or back from windows use samba.
Brian1 |
Quote:
|
It's going to be OS X, SuSE 9.3 and, Windows. I have SFU for the Windows boxen... I'm just hopping that the client is worth a damn.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I remember correctly, SFU will allow you to mount an NFS share. Not sure about performance, though. |
Just because same topic is interesting me:
Is NFS better then Samba for Linux only network? I have some problems with samba configuration so is it worth to go for NFS? I will have to share printer also, as I understand there are separate setup for printer sharing - not via NFS. What should I use for linux printer sharing? |
Yes, NFS is well worth it. Very well worth it.
As for printing, I think you can use CUPS. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM. |