Hi,
My M/c has got three Interfaces

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:14:F0:3A
inet addr:59.163.222.47 Bcast:59.163.222.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe14:f03a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2970193 errors:3 dropped:7 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:60721 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:377065991 (359.5 MiB) TX bytes:5624457 (5.3 MiB)
Interrupt:177 Base address:0x2000

eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:14:F0:44
inet addr:10.59.4.47 Bcast:10.59.4.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe14:f044/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:31 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:89 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:2506 (2.4 KiB) TX bytes:4858 (4.7 KiB)
Interrupt:185 Base address:0x2080

eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:14:F0:4E
inet addr:10.59.5.47 Bcast:10.59.5.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe14:f04e/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:480 (480.0 b) TX bytes:546 (546.0 b)
Interrupt:169 Base address:0x2400

eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:14:F0:58
inet addr:10.59.6.47 Bcast:10.59.6.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe14:f058/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:480 (480.0 b) TX bytes:546 (546.0 b)
Interrupt:177 Base address:0x2480

My Route Table looks Like this


Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
64.233.161.0 59.163.222.45 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.59.6.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth3
10.59.4.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
202.43.219.0 59.163.222.45 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.59.5.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
202.86.7.0 59.163.222.45 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
64.233.169.0 59.163.222.45 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
212.227.93.0 59.163.222.45 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
59.163.222.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth3
0.0.0.0 59.163.222.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0


I want to route the packate from eth1 through 59.163.222.45 and I cant do that I know because both are in the different subnet so how can I do that ?

this is not urgent for our voluntary members, please do not use such words in future.

Hello,

Do you want to route only certain packets through eth0 or all traffic, hence setting eth0 as gateway for eth1?

Have a look at this Linux Routing.

Depending on what you exactly want you could also use IPTABLES. Also to allow LinuxQuestions users to help you out provide what distro you're using etc.

Little warning: it's not a good idea to provide your WAN IP in a public forum for anyone to read, best replace it by XXX before posting. You never know who is looking.

Kind regards,

Eric

Well that was clearly urgent wasn't it...

Apparently! Maybe suffering from timezone shift or alike, but more than 12 hours???

Sorry If I have done some mistake but guys I have written a word Urgent okay I did not know so.....But to say this thing there are many better ways. I felt you are bit rude.But anyways thanks for the help guys. Keep up the good work.

im finding it interesting that some people in this forum are quick to point fingers, but slow to help...


the guy asking for help is a newb on this site, just like me. He probably doesnt even speak english as a first language. it can be very discouraging for people asking for help, when all they get is.. (hope you catch my drift) and sure ban me if you want, but after the responses ive gotten ive decided not to ask for help again on this forum.

I agree that posting a first response of "it's not urgent for us" and without addressing the OP's questions, as some LQ members do, does not help advertise the LQ Community as being helpful. Moderators of course have dispensation to do so anyway for educational purposes but indeed the effect remains the same. It's also often pointed out that regardless of the first response there will be helpful replies but that's besides the point and not always the case.

Please feel free to ask questions but it would be good to know basic netiquette, the LQ Rules, How to ask specific questions and if applicable How to Use LinuxQuestions.org and the LQ FAQ.

Why do you want to route packets based upon the interface they arrive at? It's not a normal task.

1. Use ibtables to mark packets based on incoming interface.
2. Use "ip rule" to select different routing tables based on the mark.
3. Use "ip route" to add entries to the routing tables explicitly stating the logical interface.

maybe something like...

Actually acid_kewpie was actually HELPING him...

I ALWAYS skip over the "urgent" messages...and focus on the ones that actually PROVIDE useful info in the subject...

He was trying to help him to actually get MORE responses in the future...

-C

Helping him would have been to point him here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...estion-531122/

Correct.

-C