LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2005, 06:36 PM   #1
onewave
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
static routes, bonding, vlan not working with RHEL3


I have been trying for some time now to get static routing "truely" working on RHEL3 with NIC bonding and 802.1q vlan support, and nothing has worked except a hacked-up way of doing things.

First, does anyone know if RHEL3 uses /etc/sysconfig/static-routes, or /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-interfacename? I have tried both, and neither seem to work in this scenario.

I think that the problem may be that the bonding and vlan configurations force you to rename your ethernet devices. So, instead of having eth0 and eth1, I actually have: bond0.130 and bond0.140 as the named ethernet devices. I have tried using both the traditional names (ethX) and the newly configured ones, and neither seem to respond that well.

Any advice, syntax examples, etc??

Thanks in advance!
 
Old 05-12-2005, 07:21 AM   #2
baldy3105
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Distribution: Mint (Desktop), Debian (Server)
Posts: 891

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
Strictly speaking your static routes should be pointing to an IP address as next hop, not an interface name. The only routes pointing at interfaces should be directly connected subnets.
 
Old 05-12-2005, 02:40 PM   #3
onewave
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for the info.

The static routes actually are other local subnets - for example:
a 10.0.0.0 route across our back-channel from co-lo to corporate.
172.16.13.0 needs to route to 172.16.18.0, etc.

My issue is more of a configuration issue than anything I think(?), or maybe the order in which files are read at boot time.

If I do not use the bonding/vlan drivers, static routing works perfectly pointed to eth0/eth1...
 
Old 05-13-2005, 05:21 AM   #4
baldy3105
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Distribution: Mint (Desktop), Debian (Server)
Posts: 891

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
When I say local I mean local to the router not the site. A router has two basic types of route. Directly connected routes and indirect or learned routes from routing protocols. Static routes are considered to be a routing protocol for this purpose.

A connected route is a network for which the router has an interface which is a member of that network, i.e. an interface configured with an IP address belonging to that subnet. The router will have routes for these networks by default as they are derived from the interfaces. Any packets destined for these networks are arped for directly.

Any route which is indirect must point at a next hop address as the router needs to arp for the mac address of the gateway. It cannot arp for the mac address of the end host as the next hop is a router and routers are layer2 domain boundaries.

If you point an indirect route at a local interface you are basically confusing the whole issue and it may or may not work as the router cannot resolve the next-hop mac address and may attempt to arp for it directly and hope to get a proxy response which may or may not arrive depending on the ip stack of the routers concerned.

Its generally a bad idea on multi-access networks. Also if you do it this way the names don't matter.
 
Old 05-13-2005, 06:50 AM   #5
bholler
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Nigeria
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
static route configuration detail

hello guys,

i am really delighted to see this thread.....but i have a small problem with static routing. i installed clarckconnect 3.0 home edition as a core router for my network with with features of DNSmasq, ip forwarding, Loadbalancing, and static route for the indirect route on the distribution router.

Can anyone kindly assist me on how to populate the static route in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-interfacename ........in a step by step guide.i have tried all that i know but the static route disappears anytime i restart the PC.


Thanking you for your quick response.

Best Regards
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I config static routes? mikezang Linux - Networking 4 10-31-2005 10:29 AM
Max Static Routes? roundst Linux - Networking 2 07-28-2005 02:51 AM
automatic static routes? eantoranz Linux - Networking 5 07-19-2005 08:30 PM
Setting static routes on LAN cranium2004 Linux - Networking 3 01-06-2005 11:57 PM
static-routes in Mandrake 10.0 tallthom Mandriva 1 09-27-2004 12:51 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration