Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
05-27-2007, 09:08 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Montréal
Distribution: Linux from scratch
Posts: 68
Rep:
|
smtp hacking and multiple emails
'Hacking' as the legitimate, code-loving way, that is ;-)
I have a weekly newsletter and I want to send several messages. Each recipient has a slightly different letter with a unique "unsubscribe" URL.
I don't want to use the transport relay of an MTA like postfix. I want to code it myself and access directly my ISP's SMTP server.
Is it (possible / legal / moral) to use a single connection to send all these copies or should I use multiple delayed (1 or 2 seconds) connections for each letter ? I don't know which is better for testing my ISP's good-will and patience ;-)
Any hint appeciated.
|
|
|
05-28-2007, 01:29 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Distribution: ArchLinux, ArchServer, Fedora, CentOS
Posts: 449
Rep:
|
I would think the multiple delayed connections would be better personally... But it depends on your ISP's "Acceptable Use" policy.
Why don't you want to setup and use your own MTA? The data has to leave your PC anyway, wouldn't it be better and less "infringing", to send them directly from your network to the recipients server and leave your ISP's mail server out of it?
|
|
|
05-28-2007, 09:09 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Location: São Paulo
Distribution: Gentoo & Debian
Posts: 97
Rep:
|
You should use just one connection.
Dont do multiple connections as the same time, you probably will be blocked!
[]´s, FMC!
Quote:
Originally Posted by narc
'Hacking' as the legitimate, code-loving way, that is ;-)
I have a weekly newsletter and I want to send several messages. Each recipient has a slightly different letter with a unique "unsubscribe" URL.
I don't want to use the transport relay of an MTA like postfix. I want to code it myself and access directly my ISP's SMTP server.
Is it (possible / legal / moral) to use a single connection to send all these copies or should I use multiple delayed (1 or 2 seconds) connections for each letter ? I don't know which is better for testing my ISP's good-will and patience ;-)
Any hint appeciated.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|