Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am trying to access a > 2 GByte file resident on a Win2k server drive smbmounted on a RH 9.0 client (2.4.20), but 'ls -l' shows a bogus file size:
# ls -l /mnt/mary-2/Temp/big
total 2145927296
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18446744072115847168 Jun 24 18:53 t.big
A google search lead me to learn that to properly access large files 2.4.20 needs a kernel patch and a patched smbmount as well, but the only patches I can find are for Debian, nothing for RedHat 9.
I know this is an old thread but we are having file transfer problems between a win2k box and rh 9-smp machine. Specifically, we want to backup our Exchange db which is about 16 gig. Here's what we found so far:
Large File Support (LFS) has been fixed in the 2.4.x series kernels as far as I can tell. I just made several big files ( > 4GB ) and moved them around on Redhat 9 (rh 9) with no problems.
A mount of the windows file system into the Linux space with mount -t smbfs (smbmount) will cause the file size to be way off and any file operations with the large files to be corrupt. You may also generate an extreeme amount of network traffic...
The same operations with smbclient will work correctly _with_ the newest version of samba (3 rc3). Until we updated, we could not get the file to transfer at all.
We are researching the smbmount problems, because we would like to use rsync without resorting to cygwin / rsyncd on the Win clients...
Although there appear to be SAMBA patches which will allow Win2k.XP clients to access large files on SAMBA servers, I didn't have the time or skills to apply them to RH 9, so we bought a NFS server for Win2k and used NFS mounts to access the Win files.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.