Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 11:10 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: MDK 10.0 Official Download
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
Slow Web Browsing: Konquerer/Mozilla
I am using Mdk 10.0CE. Web browsing using both Konquerer and Mozilla (1.6) are painfully slow. It took 2mins 44 secs to download a 1280x1024 wall paper from kde-look.
I am on a 3.5Mbps cable connection. The ftp however is blazing fast. (~900Kbytes/sec). Can somebody help me figure out what the problem is.
Thank you
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 11:33 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131
Rep:
|
perhaps too much traffic on the site(s) you surf on? I mean, I've never heard that a web browser could make that big difference between good and bad bandwith that it could be said to be slow..altough mozilla's firefox seems to be somehow faster than the others I've tried this far, I'd say the main reason for slowness is the traffic that goes through the server(s) you use. ftp and http are two different things...
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 01:32 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 123
Rep:
|
Do you notice this accross all sites? Post a link to site where you get a slow download so we can see.
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 05:15 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: MDK 10.0 Official Download
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I've tried both high traffic websites (cnn, nytimes, yahoo....) and low traffic ones (small company names). It seems like website traffic has got no bearing. I've tried visiting "text only" pages. No luck there either. Even Bittorrent works just fine. (FC2-1,2,3,4 came down in less than 2 hours). This has me stumped.
|
|
|
05-25-2004, 01:19 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Helena Montana
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 22
Rep:
|
I have had the EXACT same problem. wget and mozilla downloads large file easily enough, but requests for small files on standard pages seem to take forever. I installed a new version of mozilla, same issue. The transfer speeds are rather good, so that makes me think that it is a DNS issue except that nslookup runs at a reasonable speed.
Just like you said, ftp and scp are fast enough, but the initial request still seems to take forever. For instance, it takes about 3 minutes forthe start page for kernel.org to load, but downloading the sources only takes a couple of seconds once it starts...
|
|
|
05-25-2004, 05:26 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Helena Montana
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 22
Rep:
|
I fixed my problem
Nothing really interesting here: my primary dns server was REALLY slow beacuse I put them in in reverse order (installing Mandrake 10) of how my University recomended (primary switched with secondary). Now it seems to be working great. The best way to tell if this is your problem is to see if you can load an IP address notably faster than the URL for the same location.
Good luck
|
|
|
05-29-2004, 12:47 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: MDK 10.0 Official Download
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
@%^@$#%.
Ok. Now this is getting to be wierd. I am using DHCP for by cable modem connection. When I go into Mandrake Control Center and look at Manage Connections eth0 shows Static IP. I've changed it to DHCP, but the next time I go back in, I see Static IP again.
But in any case, my browsing speed hasn't changed.
|
|
|
06-25-2004, 01:11 AM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 18
Rep:
|
Firefox is really slow on mandrake as well and I have no idea why. I use Firefox on my windows machine right next to it and it runs just fine. I have been waiting for 4 minutes for the wallpaper section to load at kdelook.org and it just says resolving host. Even google takes a long time to load. I have 1.5/768 DSL
Last edited by McKnight; 06-25-2004 at 01:14 AM.
|
|
|
06-25-2004, 10:20 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
Hi. Am having exactly the same problem.
Google takes 40 seconds to load under SuSE, 1 second under windows, but get fine download speeds under linux. Got me stumped.
|
|
|
06-25-2004, 02:24 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: SuSE 10.0 - 11.4
Posts: 347
Rep:
|
Sounds like DNS problems - if the symptoms are slow speed to get anything but then page loads at normal speed.
|
|
|
06-26-2004, 04:19 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: mandrake
Posts: 66
Rep:
|
I am having same problem with dial up. everything was fine in 9.1 this all happened when I installed 10. I am a noob but on my computer it acts as if it thinks its not connected and due to this it keeps trying to establish a connection (when picking up the phone I hear the initail connecting tones over and over with no end)
|
|
|
06-30-2004, 02:38 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Suse 9.0
Posts: 120
Rep:
|
Here's what worked for me..
I disabled the onboard wireless NIC.
I fyou have more than one NIC in your system; perhaps Linux is sending HTTP requests through the not connected NIC first?
|
|
|
07-01-2004, 08:26 AM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: SuSE 10.0 - 11.4
Posts: 347
Rep:
|
Re: Here's what worked for me..
Quote:
Originally posted by hp46168
I disabled the onboard wireless NIC.
If you have more than one NIC in your system; perhaps Linux is sending HTTP requests through the not connected NIC first?
|
Good point - I've got a laptop with onboard ethernet and I've been playing around with a wireless PCMCIA card as well. I use DHCP for both and it happens to be the same router so the router IP address is the same. However, unless you configure the cards manually they'll both try and set the default gateway and the DNS nameserver. If I just leave it to fight itself out it depends on which one gets loaded first on booting as to what connection will work if any. If I look at 'route' I canl see that it's set up default gateways on both cards. 'ifdown ethx' or whatever the card is that you want to disable makes the one I want spring into life.
The relevant config files are in /etc/sysconfig/network/ (mine are ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-wlan0) and you can tune the parameters there to decide what they do on boot and what dhcp settings you want - only one card should have DHCLIENT_SET_DEFAULT_ROUTE="yes". If those files don't have dhcp settings in then there are default files (at least on my system in /etc/sysconfig/network/) called config, dhcp, routes and wireless. Pinch the bits you want out of any of these files and put them into the ifcfg-ethxx file.
|
|
|
11-16-2004, 05:53 AM
|
#15
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
The above link will fix your problem.
Last edited by lothor; 11-16-2004 at 05:56 AM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|