Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
08-09-2002, 03:07 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Red Hat
Posts: 25
Rep:
|
setting up DNS behind a firewall.....
I 've setup a DNS on Redhat 7.3 and i 've properly configure all those settings to point to the private ip 10.X.X.X. Tested the DNS, and it resolve all the queries i sent using tools like "nslookup" or "dig". I got few zone file within that DNS and they are working well. The /etc/hosts file is configure to point to the internal IP namely:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localhostdomain.com localhost
10.X.X.X nameserver.abc.com nameserver
The problem is that when i put the new DNS behind a firewall, after opening port 53(DNS port), i did a testing to the DNS, it refuses to resolve my nslookup query or dig query even after I 've NAT the private IP 10.X.X.X to a public IP 192.X.X.X.
Not sure what else am i missing. All i want to do is have the DNS sitting behind a firewall and not having a split DNS.
Please help...........
|
|
|
08-10-2002, 05:09 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Spain
Distribution: Mandrake 9.1
Posts: 48
Rep:
|
I'm no expert on this but I think you need to make sure that the NAT translation is static. No doubt there's a thread somewhere (try looking in networking forum).
|
|
|
08-10-2002, 10:41 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: India, Kerala, Thrissur
Distribution: FC 7-10
Posts: 354
Rep:
|
Nat is of 2 kinds. If you did snat 10.* to 192.*, it is not enough. On the other end dnat 192.* to 10.* . And on m/c connected to that end use 192.* as the nameserver address.
--Sarin
|
|
|
08-10-2002, 10:43 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: India, Kerala, Thrissur
Distribution: FC 7-10
Posts: 354
Rep:
|
You may have to add route to 192.* m/c through your firewall if you are not able to ping 192.* from clients on the other end.
--Sarin
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|