LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-06-2020, 06:29 AM   #1
Shaggy1
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 111

Rep: Reputation: 3
Seeing differences between ping and nping stats - is this expected ?


system info:
cat /etc/centos-release
CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)

Linux lb-cam-bca-centos7devel 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 14 21:49:04 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ping -V
ping utility, iputils-s20160308
[root@lb-cam-bca-centos7devel infping]# nping -V

Nping version 0.6.40 ( http://nmap.org/nping )
[root@lb-cam-bca-centos7devel infping]#


I've recently been using ping and nping to monitor some latency issues and have noticed that there seems to be a discrepancy in the output between the two, specifically with regards to min rtt.

The actual reason I use nping is so I can use the --tcp option to specifically monitor tcp trip times and initially thought the discrepancy was to do with using tcp, but I see it even when removing the use of that option.

When do a ping I see something like the following:
ping -c 10 remotehost
PING remotehost.net (10.110.48.94) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=110 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=10.3 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=10.3 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=26.8 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=59.8 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=47.5 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=64.7 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=39.0 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=9 ttl=54 time=57.0 ms
64 bytes from remotehost.net (10.110.48.94): icmp_seq=10 ttl=54 time=73.2 ms

--- remotehost.net ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 10.323/49.928/110.192/28.873 ms

Because there are issues with this connection the reported values vary widely, but generally the min rtt is consistent with the individusl values and also with the output I see using mtr.

However when using nping I consistently get output looking something like this:
nping -c 10 remotehost

Starting Nping 0.6.40 ( http://nmap.org/nping ) at 2020-07-06 12:11 BST
SENT (0.0226s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=1] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
RCVD (0.0328s) ICMP [10.110.48.94 > 10.168.6.115 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=62976 seq=1] IP [ttl=54 id=55802 iplen=28 ]
SENT (1.0234s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=2] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
RCVD (1.0336s) ICMP [10.110.48.94 > 10.168.6.115 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=62976 seq=2] IP [ttl=54 id=55804 iplen=28 ]
SENT (2.0240s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=3] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
SENT (3.0244s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=4] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
SENT (4.0250s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=5] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
SENT (5.0258s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=6] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
RCVD (5.0259s) ICMP [10.110.48.94 > 10.168.6.115 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=62976 seq=3] IP [ttl=54 id=55806 iplen=28 ]
SENT (6.0268s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=7] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
SENT (7.0276s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=8] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
SENT (8.0287s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=9] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]
RCVD (8.0288s) ICMP [10.110.48.94 > 10.168.6.115 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=62976 seq=4] IP [ttl=54 id=55808 iplen=28 ]
SENT (9.0336s) ICMP [10.168.6.115 > 10.110.48.94 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=62976 seq=10] IP [ttl=64 id=35732 iplen=28 ]

Max rtt: 10.177ms | Min rtt: 0.042ms | Avg rtt: 5.104ms
Raw packets sent: 10 (280B) | Rcvd: 4 (184B) | Lost: 6 (60.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.03 seconds

This is indicating packet loss where (usually) ping does not and the reported min rtt is consistently very low (<0.1) which is clearly (to my mind) incorrect.

As I understood it both ping an nping use icmp by default and I should be getting similar output. Is that not the case ? Have I mis-understood what nping is doing ?

Does anyone have an explanation for the differences I am seeing here ?
 
Old 07-06-2020, 11:19 AM   #2
Shaggy1
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 111

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Some additional info:
I did some quick tests pinging to a machine on the local sub-net, since we are having network latency issues that could be causing something strange, but there still seems to be a discrepancy between ping an nping.

ping -c 100 -i 0.1 10.168.6.126 # done ten times
...
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9928ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.142/0.256/3.982/0.378 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9926ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.120/0.234/0.545/0.062 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9926ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.139/0.225/0.572/0.063 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9925ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.108/0.202/0.890/0.082 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9908ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.100/0.213/0.623/0.071 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9928ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.134/0.262/4.433/0.422 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9912ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.098/0.201/0.516/0.048 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9952ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.121/0.606/9.890/1.615 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9909ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.136/0.217/0.394/0.046 ms

100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 9920ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.105/0.317/3.826/0.569 ms



nping -c 100 --rate 10 10.168.6.126 # done ten times
...
Max rtt: 14.412ms | Min rtt: 0.033ms | Avg rtt: 1.433ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 99 (4.554KB) | Lost: 1 (1.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.92 seconds

Max rtt: 10.952ms | Min rtt: 0.031ms | Avg rtt: 0.543ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 99 (4.554KB) | Lost: 1 (1.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.97 seconds

Max rtt: 11.317ms | Min rtt: 0.033ms | Avg rtt: 0.517ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 99 (4.554KB) | Lost: 1 (1.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.94 seconds

Max rtt: 11.162ms | Min rtt: 0.032ms | Avg rtt: 0.400ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 100 (4.600KB) | Lost: 0 (0.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.93 seconds

Max rtt: 10.970ms | Min rtt: 0.033ms | Avg rtt: 1.012ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 99 (4.554KB) | Lost: 1 (1.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.97 seconds

Max rtt: 10.897ms | Min rtt: 0.033ms | Avg rtt: 0.504ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 97 (4.462KB) | Lost: 3 (3.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.93 seconds

Max rtt: 0.660ms | Min rtt: 0.032ms | Avg rtt: 0.122ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 95 (4.370KB) | Lost: 5 (5.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.92 seconds

Max rtt: 10.278ms | Min rtt: 0.031ms | Avg rtt: 0.635ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 99 (4.554KB) | Lost: 1 (1.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.93 seconds

Max rtt: 10.914ms | Min rtt: 0.032ms | Avg rtt: 0.446ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 100 (4.600KB) | Lost: 0 (0.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.92 seconds

Max rtt: 11.039ms | Min rtt: 0.032ms | Avg rtt: 0.522ms
Raw packets sent: 100 (2.800KB) | Rcvd: 100 (4.600KB) | Lost: 0 (0.00%)
Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 9.99 seconds
 
Old 07-07-2020, 06:24 AM   #3
Shaggy1
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 111

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Another update:
nping looks to be working fine on another of my machines with centos 6:

$ cat /etc/centos-release
CentOS release 6.8 (Final)

$ nping -V
Nping version 0.5.51 ( http://nmap.org/nping )

I noticed an Nmap developers thread "nping appears to miss or drop a packet when run with newer kernel/libraries":
https://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2014/q1/57
which seems to indicate there have bee problems seen with nping 0.6.40 with certain kernels.

Does anyone know anything about that ?
 
Old 07-07-2020, 07:38 AM   #4
Shaggy1
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 111

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Further update:
I tried downloading and building the latest version of nmap (7.80) and using the nping from that, but it's still showing packet loss and (probably as a result) incorrect stats.
Guess there must be some incompatability with the kernel.
 
  


Reply

Tags
centos7, ping



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
monitoring network stats and user stats robertkwild CentOS 2 11-22-2017 03:54 AM
[SOLVED] Scripting result of nping - extracting number of lost pings jeff_russell35 Linux - General 9 03-18-2016 02:05 PM
I cannot ping with command 'ping IP' address but can ping with 'ping IP -I eth0' sanketmlad Linux - Networking 2 07-15-2011 05:32 AM
What differences are there between linux's and windows's ping instruction? backpacker Linux - Software 2 04-04-2006 01:40 AM
how to change Seeing this instead of the website you expected nuurul_basar Linux - General 2 07-27-2005 10:27 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration