Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
11-08-2014, 12:56 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Rep:
|
Question about pinging results
I tried to test the reliability of the wireless network connection by record the pinging results. I used the command:
"ping -c 10000 192.168.xx.xx >/tmp/ping.log &"
The result recorded in the ping.log file shows:
"10000 packets transmitted, 9981 received, 0% packet loss, time 10011246ms ..."
Can someone told me why the transmitted packets are more then the received ones but there's no packet loss?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
11-08-2014, 12:58 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2009
Distribution: Rocky Linux
Posts: 4,792
|
It's 0.19% loss. Rounded to a whole number, that's 0.
|
|
|
11-08-2014, 02:32 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/Fedora
Posts: 457
Rep:
|
Maths, dude...
|
|
|
11-08-2014, 04:15 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaWdLy
Maths, dude...
|
Do you mean people in computer programming only know integer numbers in math?
|
|
|
11-08-2014, 04:26 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/Fedora
Posts: 457
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by twinclouds
Do you mean people in computer programming only know integer numbers in math?
|
Yes. That's exactly what I mean.
|
|
|
11-08-2014, 04:32 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Sorry. I didn't realize that. I will keep this in mind.
|
|
|
11-08-2014, 04:37 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/Fedora
Posts: 457
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by twinclouds
Sorry. I didn't realize that. I will keep this in mind.
|
I'm sure they will appreciate that.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|