Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I got into weird issue with PPTP VPN. For some reason the same configuration works fine (I am able to connect) on Ubuntu 20.04 but it doesn't work in Debian 10 or 11. On Debian in the logs I am getting:
Code:
Oct 12 17:44:51 x pppd[567]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/1
Oct 12 17:44:51 x systemd-udevd[569]: ethtool: autonegotiation is unset or enabled, the speed and duplex are not writable.
Oct 12 17:44:51 x pptp[570]: anon log[main:pptp.c:353]: The synchronous pptp option is NOT activated
Oct 12 17:44:52 x pptp[579]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:259]: Sent control packet type is 1 'Start-Control-Connection-Request'
Oct 12 17:44:52 x pptp[579]: anon log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:781]: Received Start Control Connection Reply
Oct 12 17:44:52 x pptp[579]: anon log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:815]: Client connection established.
Oct 12 17:44:52 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:44:53 x pptp[579]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:259]: Sent control packet type is 7 'Outgoing-Call-Request'
Oct 12 17:44:53 x pptp[579]: anon log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:900]: Received Outgoing Call Reply.
Oct 12 17:44:53 x pptp[579]: anon log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:939]: Outgoing call established (call ID 35522, peer's call ID 26496).
Oct 12 17:44:55 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:44:58 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:45:01 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:45:04 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:45:07 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:45:10 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:45:13 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:45:16 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:45:19 x pppd[567]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x1346f064> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 12 17:45:22 x pppd[567]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Oct 12 17:45:22 x pppd[567]: Connection terminated.
Oct 12 17:45:22 x pppd[567]: Modem hangup
Distribution: Ubuntu based stuff for the most part
Posts: 1,173
Rep:
I found on a search, to add the "silent" option to your config, so it will wait for a packet from the server.
But PPTP is a dead technology, and you should replace it with something that is secure. Tailscale lets you easily setup wireguard on nearly all OS's.
I found on a search, to add the "silent" option to your config, so it will wait for a packet from the server.
But PPTP is a dead technology, and you should replace it with something that is secure. Tailscale lets you easily setup wireguard on nearly all OS's.
So how this can help to solve my issue? I know it is obsolete but it is not me who managing this.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.