LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-22-2003, 06:57 PM   #1
Mutiny
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question NFS/SMB weird question


I've got a really weird question:

I have Windows system A, with a share named "files".

I have a Linux server B, mounting the share in /opt/files

I want my other Linux computers C through F to mount /opt on B and have access to the files directory.

The SMB mount works fine on B. All files are accessable.

I can NFS mount the B:/opt directory just fine from C-F, but the /opt/files directory is empty.

Somehow NFS is not letting the SMB share pass through.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Mutiny
 
Old 03-22-2003, 11:38 PM   #2
Pcghost
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Arctic
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820

Rep: Reputation: 46
Why not map the /opt directory on the windows box, thereby removing the need for local storage and reducing the links by one? That way both the windows machine and the other machines c-f could all mount the /opt directory on the server.
 
Old 03-23-2003, 12:03 PM   #3
Mutiny
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to do that in this situation.

Also, the Windows machine will change quite often, along with the content of the shared directory.

The original plan was to make only one of the Linux systems have to change it's mount and look for the new Windows share. The Linux terminals would have a constant mount point.

It makes sense when you figure in the fact that eventually there will be MANY terminals.

After much research, a fellow on the HardOCP OS forum pointed out that kernel NFS does not allow this action. I would need the older user space NFS.

The solution I came up with is that since this is an OpenMosix cluster, I can use MFS to mount the shared folder and get a speed increase over NFS. I made a symlink through /mfs to the server. (/mfs/1/opt/files --> /opt/files)

Being a cluster this is the solution I should have used in the first place.

Thanks for the suggestions,
Mutiny
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFS of SMB preference filsed Linux - Networking 3 01-28-2005 04:42 PM
SMB + NFS Interworking abbaspour Linux - Networking 0 01-18-2005 06:21 AM
NFS or SMB? What is the best way? GradyVogt Linux - Networking 4 02-06-2004 11:55 AM
SMB vs NFS with redhat 9 carmoda Linux - Networking 0 11-21-2003 04:13 AM
automount nfs and smb al_erola Linux - Networking 2 04-27-2003 11:33 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration