Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am mounting a directory from a Slack 10.0 to a Slack 10.1 box. The drive mounts just fine except for a permissions error kicked up on the client machine (10.1 box) when I want to write to the drive.
acid_kewpie wrote:
why are you using all those options??
Actually, those tend to be the default settings on NFS as far as I can tell. In any event, even specifying simply rw,sync in the /etc/exports and mounting the drive again yields the same problem, i.e.
Those aren't default options at all... there really aren't any default options, as it's so basic. something like "no_root_squash" opens up HUGE security issues, that's no default.
well then that should be all you need for the NFS stage. The great thing about NFS is that it's still unix level all the way, obviously unlike samba, SO... if you have a permission denied chances are it's due to existing serverside filesystem permissions, and not related to NFS at all.
Originally posted by acid_kewpie Those aren't default options at all... there really aren't any default options, as it's so basic. something like "no_root_squash" opens up HUGE security issues, that's no default.
secure;
ro;
sync (for versions post 1.0.0);
nohide
In addition to these certain defaults can be explcitly stated.
This was taken from the man pages, which would seem to suggest that there are defaults ... so what do you mean when you write that there are no defaults? What are you referring to?
Quote:
SO... if you have a permission denied chances are it's due to existing serverside filesystem permissions, and not related to NFS at all.
OK ... so you mean that the server side directory being exported needs to have its permissions modified in order to allow the client to write to that directory as well? Would that be world-writable or group writable or user writable? Would there be any settings/permissions to modify on the client side?
the access rights model over NFS is exactly the same as a native Unix filesystem. NFS has no right to override local file system attributes. it's not a case of making it world writable etc... just complaing with whatever conventional Unix permissions.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.