Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
12-03-2001, 10:21 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2001
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 140
Rep:
|
Network card change
At the moment i'm using my Celeron 366 to act as my file and print
server for my home network, however I only have a 10Mb Nic in it. This has been fine for now but i'm going to be getting a 24x cd-r this christmas and the 10Nic will not cut it.
Right now I use a 4x cdrom and the networks throughput is more then enough
for it , but there is no way It will be able to keep up with a 24x
I'm planing on buying a Smartlink 1205RC, D-link DFE-530TX+, or the SMC SMC1244TX. I'm still not 100% sure which is the best.
My question is, if I remove my current NIC (which was automatically found my
redhat install) and put in the new one will I have to do any configuation
changes to get it to recognize the 10/100 capability or to my samba or ssh
settings?
|
|
|
12-04-2001, 05:40 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Fairfax, California
Distribution: RH 9.0, RH 7.3, Mandrake 8.0
Posts: 986
Rep:
|
As long as the NIC and its corresponding module load up correctly, that should be all. I know that Samba is unaware of the actual network hardware and its capabilities; I believe anyhting like ssh, telnet, etc., are the same.
|
|
|
12-06-2001, 08:47 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: The Netherlands
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,316
Rep:
|
Like he said just change the module and the rest will work.
I doubt you'll be able to burn at 24 speed over the network. Even if you do change to a 100mbit network card.
Theoretically it should all work. A 80 minute cd at 24 speed should take about 3 and a half minutes. So that would be 700MB to transfer in 3 and a half minutes. That's about 3.5 MB per second. Ok technically a 100mbit card should have a transfer rate of 12.5 MB per second and the protocol you are using is generating a lot of overhead, and there might be collisions on the network so you could probably take off about a third of the speed but even then you still should be able to reach the speed.
But those aren't really the limiting factors the biggest limiting factors are your harddrive and the speed at which the processor can slap a TCP/IP header to the data and send it off to the network.
You said you had a celeron 366 as a server and I don't know what kind of harddrive you have in there but I bet it's not the fastest on the market either. The CPU will be heavely overloaded at higher speeds depending some nics use less cpu processing power which might help a lot.
Anyways I think you'll be lucky if you even make it at 12 speed. But then again that's always faster then the 4 speed at which you where burning.
You'd better hope your getting a writer which supports buffer underrun so that your cd doesn't get messed up every time there is a slight hiccup on the network.
Mik
|
|
|
12-06-2001, 09:31 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2001
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 140
Original Poster
Rep:
|
trust me, i've taken all this into acount. The burner I got is a Teac 24/10/40 which has burn-proof. So that should be fine. But thanx for the headsup
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|