Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Can anyone recommend the best software for monitoring Linux AND Win2k servers/workstations? I'm interested in both network AND system monitoring capabilities.
If cost is no object.. Then I would hire a guy to code the server and client parameters into mrtg and nagios. HP Openview is nice/easier, but the GPL one is more versatile IMHO.
Originally posted by Thoreau If cost is no object.. Then I would hire a guy to code the server and client parameters into mrtg and nagios. HP Openview is nice/easier, but the GPL one is more versatile IMHO.
I've never configured either, so I don't know, but aren't nagios and mrtg overlapping products or is one better suited for systems and the other for networks/routers?
I'm seriously considering taking the nagios plunge and wondering if it will be worth the effort it is going to require. Right now we have a crappy configuration of sitescope that I'm on the verge of taking a shotgun to.
Originally posted by jbeiter I've never configured either, so I don't know, but aren't nagios and mrtg overlapping products or is one better suited for systems and the other for networks/routers?
I'm seriously considering taking the nagios plunge and wondering if it will be worth the effort it is going to require. Right now we have a crappy configuration of sitescope that I'm on the verge of taking a shotgun to.
It costs nothing to try it out. You need to do alot of testing before you make a tool production anyways. Take the time to try out a couple of the "bigger" packages.
OpenView, NG and Opennms offer a ton of features. The problem is if you only want to look at system stats and or uptime they are complete over kill.. They also require clients to be loaded on the machines for some of the information to be polled.
The people suggesting this stuff are obviously stat hounds (not to mention openview is completely out of the scope of this discussion).
Use mrtg to graph uptime and resource usage, and call it a day.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.