Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
12-18-2001, 04:56 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Distribution: LFS, RH, Slack
Posts: 104
Rep:
|
Is it easier to use telnetd without inetd?
I want to set up a telnet server on my redhat box. The standard way looks to be by running inetd and having it run telnetd on demand. I don't use inetd and don't have it installed, though. Would it be easy enough to install telnetd without inetd and configure it to run without inetd? Or is inetd necessary for proper operation?
|
|
|
12-18-2001, 05:01 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2001
Distribution: MD81 RH71
Posts: 555
Rep:
|
telnet is run via inetd or xinetd, it's not designed to be run as a standalone service. you really should aready have xinetd
|
|
|
12-18-2001, 05:13 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Distribution: LFS, RH, Slack
Posts: 104
Original Poster
Rep:
|
What's the difference between inetd and xinetd. Xinetd is the x version? Why on earth would you run that kind of server from X?
|
|
|
12-18-2001, 05:20 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2001
Distribution: MD81 RH71
Posts: 555
Rep:
|
no, xinetd is just a better version. nothign to do with x. there's loads things that start with x that are xwindows based... xfs etc...
but inetd uses just on scary conf file, whil xinetd has confugarble files for each service, laiod out nicer... onyl real difference config wise, i'm sure it's all very different round the back
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|