Given the following scenario, what's a good way to migrate to Linux?
Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Given the following scenario, what's a good way to migrate to Linux?
I realize that this question might be vague, but please hear me out.
I'm an intern at a small time software company. We do web hosting, technical support, etc., in addition to producing bits of software no one will ever hear about. Currently, I do most of the tech support and a little bit of sysadminning. I'm not very familiar with Windows servers (which we use), but the regular sysadmin is a wiz with such things, so nothing to worry about, right? Wrong. After he quit, the duty of upkeeping the Windows network has fallen to me.
Now, I'm no Linux expert, but I feel a lot more comfortable using Linux, especially in a server environment. I feel that Windows tends to be clumsy, especially as a server, and that information and help for Linux tends to be a lot cheaper and easier to find. I'd probably be much easier working in a Linux environment, rather than uselessly learning the Windows 200* server family, since we might as well expect a new one in a year or two. Also, I find it very difficult and frustrating to try and work in an already existing Windows network. The previous guy wasn't a fan of documenting what he has worked on.
I am thinking about writing up a proposal and plan for converting the office to Linux boxes, for any obvious reason you might think about -- as well as personal preference. If I'm doing the work, I may as well be enjoying myself. The main idea is to keep as much funcionality as possible, so as not to disrupt overall productivity. Maybe you guys can help me out and recommend some Linux solutions for the following scenario:
We have a primary domain controller (Windows 2003 Server) that also is our DNS and Exchange 2003 server. We use the DNS for any hosted domains and of course our own. The Exchange server is just for office use, no hosted solutions.
We have another Windows machine that acts as our backup domain controller, backup DNS, and primary web server. The other machines are simply...uh...there, not doing anything. We use Active Directory, which basically fuels the Exchange server, as you would imagine.
I was considering this:
Keep the domain controllers and DNS servers as is, but remove Exchange. I can't seem to understand Exchange so I don't want to say that I'd be able to troubleshoot it. Best just create something from scratch, right?
Use Linux (most likely Debian Sarge) boxes for primary web servers, e-mail, ftp, ssh, and any other misc tasks.
Asuming no one can come up with a better idea than the above, I need to consider what programs and servers I'll be using...
Web: Apache, most likely. I might also keep an IIS server on a Windows box in case we need to use ASP.NET.
Mail: I'm completely unsure. Is there a good Exchange equivilant for Linux?
I suppose the mail server was my largest concern, next to interfacing with the Active Directory. I know Linux servers can authenticate against the AD, but what about building user accounts? Is there a way to automatically create user accounts for active directory members? I'd like to give each employee an account on a linux machine...It would most likely make FTP, SSH, and mail accounts easier to handle if each employee had a login to the box.
Any ideas, help, or suggestions you guys can offer would be greately appreciated. I'll linger for a while to answer any questions. Thanks.
Re: Given the following scenario, what's a good way to migrate to Linux?
I'll put thoughts inline..
Quote:
Originally posted by melonpool I'm an intern at a small time software company.
Did you apply for a permanent position yet? (Got my current job like that, after succesful internship)
Quote:
We do web hosting, technical support, etc., in addition to producing bits of software no one will ever hear about. Currently, I do most of the tech support and a little bit of sysadminning. I'm not very familiar with Windows servers (which we use), but the regular sysadmin is a wiz with such things, so nothing to worry about, right? Wrong. After he quit, the duty of upkeeping the Windows network has fallen to me.
Sounds familiar too, although I stuck to the Windows servers. we'll be running Server 2003 before summer break
Quote:
Now, I'm no Linux expert, but I feel a lot more comfortable using Linux, especially in a server environment. I feel that Windows tends to be clumsy, especially as a server, and that information and help for Linux tends to be a lot cheaper and easier to find. I'd probably be much easier working in a Linux environment, rather than uselessly learning the Windows 200* server family, since we might as well expect a new one in a year or two. Also, I find it very difficult and frustrating to try and work in an already existing Windows network. The previous guy wasn't a fan of documenting what he has worked on.
Guilty of lack of documenting skills myself. but then again I seem to be lucky, my servers are pretty low maintenance so far, configuring is still straighforward with the Microsoft 'click this wizard's colored button thingy and it'll work' strategy, my colleagues in other buildings have the exact same setup, and the fact I really don't have to worry much about those machines. It's the workstations that cause (or should I say users?) the trouble most of the time, there's always something that breaks somehow. I wouldn't say that learning the W200* platform is useless, what I would say is that it is tedious if it doesn't have ones interest I myself like Linux more and more each day, but the fact remains that my workplace, and future workplaces, will still be running Windows by what I guess would be at least a 75% chance (I like round numbers). There might be a chance I get into a new job in the future where they have *nix machines (Novell, IBM, HP-UX, Solaris, whatever strikes your fancy), so tinkering with Linux now alongside with Windows won't hurt. but I know I will have to have knowledge of both OS platforms if I want to have a chance of getting a job in the future.
Merely thinking ahead here. having proven abilities (e.g. in writing, certificates, such as the M$ MCSE/MCSA) seems to be very important for employers these days.
Quote:
I am thinking about writing up a proposal and plan for converting the office to Linux boxes, for any obvious reason you might think about -- as well as personal preference. If I'm doing the work, I may as well be enjoying myself. The main idea is to keep as much funcionality as possible, so as not to disrupt overall productivity.
Enjoying your work is important. Your users are also important, despite what some admins may believe (Shh, don't tell my colleagues I said that) Following your main idea, make up a list with software packages that are needed for the company's normal everyday work requirements, starting by listing all the currently used programs for Windows, and then finding the most stable, easiest to use/maintain Linux equivalent to put next to those for comparison, function-wise (Also, don't forget to research data migration possibilities!). Remember, (Some of?) your users will be picky, I know so from experience. if you so much as tweak user X's software package Y, or rearrange his/her desktop or move function A and integrate it with B into a newer piece of software with a different name, you will hear about it even if it is easier for them. Be prepared is my advice.
Quote:
Maybe you guys can help me out and recommend some Linux solutions for the following scenario:
We have a primary domain controller (Windows 2003 Server) that also is our DNS and Exchange 2003 server. We use the DNS for any hosted domains and of course our own. The Exchange server is just for office use, no hosted solutions.
We have another Windows machine that acts as our backup domain controller, backup DNS, and primary web server. The other machines are simply...uh...there, not doing anything. We use Active Directory, which basically fuels the Exchange server, as you would imagine.
I was considering this:
Keep the domain controllers and DNS servers as is, but remove Exchange. I can't seem to understand Exchange so I don't want to say that I'd be able to troubleshoot it. Best just create something from scratch, right?
Removing Exchange is a possibility, and will save your company money for one less M$ licence. Domain controllers don't need a lot of maintenance, just regular backups and an occasional check/reboot to refresh things a little. Which are the other machines? are those file servers?
Have to cut into the Exchange thing here for a second. Consider the possibility that if you remove Exchange, you might break a lot of things for your users. You might lose the ability that when you create a new user in the active Directory, that that user will automatically get a mailbox and global address book attached to his/her account which opens in their favorite Email application (Outlook right now, probably). For another thing, you'll have to find a solution to give everybody their mail back (some users do in fact store every email right back up to the stone age, for 'future reference') and you'll have to redo all the mail addresses or migrate them somehow without loss of data.
Very important point of warning here: A company's email address is very important and should not be changed.
If you do, the company will lose face with it's customers and business contacts, as all of them will have to change that entry in their address books, and your company will have to spend thousands reprinting all those business cards and advertisements, and re-introduce themselves to the public. The user email addresses play a big part in here too, if employee X has direct communication with customer Y, and you change X's address, Y will be confused. Don't underestimate the power of the dark side of something as simple as an email address
Quote:
Use Linux (most likely Debian Sarge) boxes for primary web servers, e-mail, ftp, ssh, and any other misc tasks.
Asuming no one can come up with a better idea than the above, I need to consider what programs and servers I'll be using...
Web: Apache, most likely. I might also keep an IIS server on a Windows box in case we need to use ASP.NET.
Mail: I'm completely unsure. Is there a good Exchange equivilant for Linux?
I suppose the mail server was my largest concern, next to interfacing with the Active Directory. I know Linux servers can authenticate against the AD, but what about building user accounts? Is there a way to automatically create user accounts for active directory members? I'd like to give each employee an account on a linux machine...It would most likely make FTP, SSH, and mail accounts easier to handle if each employee had a login to the box.
Any ideas, help, or suggestions you guys can offer would be greately appreciated. I'll linger for a while to answer any questions. Thanks.
Don't forget to investigate mail/ftp/ssh security, an open mail relay for example is really something you'd want to avoid
for the actual mail server.. don't know really, not enough experience there. I hear good things about Postfix and Qmail however. Our local ISP for instance uses Postfix server farms to handle all their email for example.
User accounts, look into Samba (and LDAP?). it can be configured with AD-like services, and it can be configured to create Samba users when Linux users are added for a bit of automation.
Best way to plan a real migration basically involves researching what your users really use in their daily job, and providing something that works the same or better (basicly meaning that you are trying to avoid interruption of daily tasks), to migrate data without any loss (databases, user data, etc.) to their new homes, and to end up with a solid system you (or your successor) can easily maintain while leaning back in your chair you have to look at things from both an Administrator perspective as well as a regular User perspective.
These are all just my worth I don't have enough knowledge right now to be more specific/helpful.
Hmm, personally I like the idea of a Linux solution, but I know from experience (like here at my work) it's hard to dike out a windows infrastructure and just put a linux one in it's place.
I would start by finding solutions for servers one by one... say start by replacing IIS with Apache, then get sendmail/qmail/postfix going to replace exchange. Later you can think of replacing the Domain Controllers with LDAP.
Firstly, get a system to play with, get say sendmail (or whatever strikes your fancy - here at work we have sendmail, but at my previous place I set up qmail... like with all things it has its good points and its bad...) up and running, then toy with migrating the data. When you've got it running at the same level as the existing server and know it works, then you can do a swap sometime. One by one you will replace the parts of the infrastructure with linux solutions, and one day you will wake up with a windows free system.. Something to look forward to.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.