gam_server?
What does the service gam_server process do?
I left my Fedora Core 3 machine logged in last night with the desktop locked. When I came in this morning I noticed my cpu utilization was at 100% and then it dropped off to normal immediately after I unlocked the workstation. I ran a netstat -tap and saw a connection closing the process was gam_server and the remote connection was 216.239.57.104 and so I did a tracert to it and dig and then opened a web browser to it and it was a Google page. Just wondering what my machine is doing connecting to Google overnight when I didn't even have a browser open. Any information would be much appreciated. Thanks, kk |
gam_server is the binary fo gamin (see http://www.gnome.org/~veillard/gamin/). It's a sgi_fam replacement for file alternation monitoring. I'm not sure how it is started on FC3, but I'd assume you can configure whether or not to run it w/ chkconfig and xinetd.
Your CPU was most likely at 100% because of the screen saver. This often happens w/ my FC2 desktop when the screen saver comes on. As to your connection to Google, it was most likely not gam_server but an old connection from a web browser -- sometimes connections don't fully close themselves. But, to be safe, I'd download rkhunter and test our your system. |
The connection to google was definately from the process gam_server according to netstat. Here is the results:
tcp 1 0 172.19.40.92:37620 216.239.57.104:http CLOSE_WAIT 23328/gam_server I will try the rkhunter. I will let you know how that goes. thanks for the response. |
I've got the same problem, but without screensaver. I can see with top that gam_server uses more than 95% of my XP 2700+ processor. What's wrong?
|
ditto. i'm seeing 97% cpu with top. no screensaver. i have an open office doc up and a badblock command is running (i guess). what starts this thing. if it is controlled by xinetd, it doesn't have an entry in your services. locate lists it as a subdir of libexec or something like that (on FC3).
i'm wondering what started it and is it legitimate or should i kill it. prefer to know what it is first. |
Same story here.
CPU at 99% with no letup. This is mad. top shows gam_server at > 70% all the time. What the heck??? EDITED TO ADD: I just killed Firefox (1.0.1) and the CPU chilled. gam_server just stopped running. Dunno what this means... |
Just woke up and my screensaver was running really slow... checked top and noticed all the same stuff you guys noticed, with gam_server hitting the top of the list at like 99% CPU usage. Apparently, it's a known issue .
As a short-term solution, I've had no problems just killing the process with a 'killall gam_server' . |
Possible Solution
The bugzilla report at redhat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla....cgi?id=132354 Gives a reasonable rundown of what is likely going on, and the 99th comment suggests installing the development rpm of gamin. I've done that for the only person here who seemed to be having a real problem with gam_server cpu usage and it looks good so far... The upgrade can be got from http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pu...6/Fedora/RPMS/ Note that if you are having problems when having large/complex filesystems under the /mnt or /media mount points then gam_server is likely to always have problems due to the way the kernel is implemented. Cheers, Tim |
Well, in my case, I do have about four NFS filesystems mounted. My /home directory isn't NFS (I've learned my lesson with that); however, I have created a "/home/private/[username]" NFS mount to which I sym-link choice directories into my userdir(s).
Am I just asking for it? (Or do NFS and gamin inherently not get along?) |
How does one get rid of gam_server
Running Redhat enterprise server Linux.
Have run our server for perhaps years at a time without problems - upgrade kernels all the time - then came gam_server. How do I safely get rid of gam_server permanently????? Thanks, andy |
|
While I am sure it would help, I am not sure it would be safe in the long run or best to go off the update path. Right now I just moniter gam_server everyday, kill it if it starts going wild, and renice it when it restarts.
I really think there needs to be a package to remove it, and it should be considered almost a virus in its current operation. Its inexcusable to me to have that kind of software out there; absolutely nothing else in Linux for years has causes so much trouble. The relatively low priority they have placed this bug and the performance hit the systems are taking is outrageous. Its time to stop defending it and either fix it or provide a clean method to eliminate it from systems. |
Quote:
I also wonder whether this gam_server CPU cycle problem has something to do with my files/folders not being updated in Nautilus until I manually refresh? |
deesto
I do not use your distro (fedora?) but you might find it relates to anacron and selinux? http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/fe.../msg02255.html. I turn off my mandriva so have to use anacron to logrotate, cull tmp etc |
Great solution from Ubuntu
I found a great solution on Ubuntu's forum (ubuntuforums.org). Here's the solution from the poster:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM. |