Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
01-26-2014, 02:52 PM
|
#16
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 125
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LYC
Hi,
There is no ntwork connection. The connection is via KVM, hence, file can not x'fer out and has to use screen shot.
No hardware changes. The server is shifted from one rack to another rack.
more /etc/sysconfig/selinux
SELINUXTYPE=targeted
lshw -c net
bash: command not found
Refer to attachment for lspci output
|
grep, essential tool, use it.
$ dmesg | egrep -i "net|eth"
lspci -vvv | less
then hit / and type "net" to search for that paricular substring in the piped input.
Also what about that iLO, IIRC the HP ones had the offline diagnostic option?
Last edited by vl23; 01-26-2014 at 02:54 PM.
|
|
|
01-26-2014, 04:31 PM
|
#17
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 109
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi,
See attached.
|
|
|
01-26-2014, 04:36 PM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 109
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi,
See attached.
|
|
|
01-26-2014, 05:23 PM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 125
Rep:
|
How many interfaces did this system have, because if it was only 2 they might've gotten renamed, check their MACs if you have the old ones, then use a udev rule to return the old names if you wish.
If you still have problems try using udevadm to rescan and see if your missing interfaces will get found, but if it is a hw issue due to the move I doubt it will happen.
|
|
|
01-26-2014, 06:52 PM
|
#20
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 109
Original Poster
Rep:
|
It should has 4 network interface, eth0, eth1, eth2 and eth3.
Output of ifconfig -a only show eth2 and eth3 (refer to attachment)
#udevadm
bash: udevadm command not found
|
|
|
01-26-2014, 07:00 PM
|
#21
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 109
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi,
Attachment is the output of dmesg | egrep -i "net|eth".
|
|
|
01-27-2014, 12:37 AM
|
#22
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 109
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi,
The following is expected to show up in dmesg but did not:
:
Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.20-k2-NAPI
e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
e1000: eth1: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
:
Can advise how to go about it?
|
|
|
01-27-2014, 08:52 AM
|
#23
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2008
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD, NomadBSD
Posts: 12
Rep:
|
To see if e1000 is loaded:
To load the module manually:
See if it complains.
P.S. No more .gif please. Post the plain text file.
|
|
|
01-27-2014, 11:33 AM
|
#24
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 125
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chantk
To see if e1000 is loaded:
To load the module manually:
See if it complains.
P.S. No more .gif please. Post the plain text file.
|
I think that lspci should have detected the hardware even if it wasn't claimed/recognized, I'd say 80/20 it is a hardware issue.
Also for the 3rd time, what happened to those hw diagnostics from the iLO?
|
|
|
01-27-2014, 04:18 PM
|
#25
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 109
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi,
No return for lsmod | grep e1000 until manually loaded as advised but eth0 using ifcomfig -a still to no avail.
Could you advise how to get hw diagnostic from iLO?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|