Hi,
I have two vlans and both are part of bridge interface. when i try to ping between the interfaces it fails.

eth1.100 // 192.168.10.100
eth1.200 // 192.168.10.200
br0 192.168.10.10

When i try the ping command "ping -I br0 192.168.10.100" it fails.

Since i want to happens this thru L2, i have removed the entries in ip route and added the static arp.

when i do brctl showmacs br0, MAC is learn as Local (Is local - yes) and since both vlan uses the same MAC, if i do the tcpdump on the interface i'm getting the packet regardless of the VLAN. Looks like look is only based on the MAC and not based on VLAN + MAC.

Is it possible to reach interfaces using L2 bridge based on the VLAN on same host.

The whole point of VLAN is to separate L2 traffic. If you want them to talk to each other, give the interface two IPs on the same VLAN or add a router.

1 members found this post helpful.

you are right,
1. i'm sending the packet with vlan (100) thru the bridge on same host. But the RX of the vlan interface is not getting incremented.
2. Even though packet is vlan tagged (100) it received on both the vlan interfaces (observed using tcpdump).

How to ensure L2 is processed based on VLAN + MAC