LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-10-2005, 12:13 PM   #1
lil_drummaboy
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Victoria, CANADA!
Distribution: OpenBSD, Slackware, Debian
Posts: 85

Rep: Reputation: 15
BayStack 350T issue


Hi,

I just recieved a Bay Networks (Now Nortel) BayStack 350T 16-port managed 10/100 autosensing switch from ebay. I have it connected to my workstation via a serial connection to the switch's console. I have a Cat 5 running from my current router (with DHCP) that is going to an ISP to port 1, and another Cat 5 running from port 2 to my workstation's NIC. I have reset the switch to default settings, all ports other than the two dead ports are enabled and are all in the same VLAN. In "IP Configuration" i have specified my current router (192.168.1.1) as the default gateway and have not changed anything else. My problem is that i am not recieving any DHCP or connection for that matter at the workstation connected to the switch. I have read the user manual i got of of Nortel's site, but it doesn't explain how to set the switch up but more give you an idea of what to enter into the config fields. I have never setup a managed switch and i am very confused if the switch is broken or configured wrong. At this point i would just like to get DHCP and connectivity to the internet. If any one can point me in the right direction or can tell me what to change that would be excellent.

Thanks for your time.

Last edited by lil_drummaboy; 11-10-2005 at 12:15 PM.
 
Old 11-11-2005, 09:35 PM   #2
wym
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 15
Try to set your eth0's IP to 192.168.1.2, gateway to 192.168.1.1, DNS address to the ISP's DNS address. It should work.

The router is obtaining Internet IP address by DHCP. Once router is working, your workstation is going to the Internet through the router. So the workstation doesn't need an Internet IP, it just need to talk to the router. That is why I suggested you setup a LAN address in your workstation. Hope this helps.

Last edited by wym; 11-11-2005 at 09:41 PM.
 
Old 11-13-2005, 01:27 PM   #3
lil_drummaboy
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Victoria, CANADA!
Distribution: OpenBSD, Slackware, Debian
Posts: 85

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
i am trying to get a 192 ip through the switch and it's not getting one, that is the problem. I'm not trying to get a public ip from my workstation, i'm looking to get a private one and the dhcp request isn't comming through the switch when i'm plugged into it. I shouldn't have to make any network setting static, the router's DHCP should work through the switch.
 
Old 11-13-2005, 02:33 PM   #4
wym
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 15
ok, i see, let's troubleshoot step by step,

1. give your box a static ip, and ping your router 192.168.1.1, if it gets any reply, that means your brandnew switch is working fine. or if you have any other computers, put them on the switch, if they can see others, it means the swithc is ok.

2. then the problem is dhcp configuration of the router
 
Old 11-13-2005, 02:35 PM   #5
btmiller
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: In the DC 'burbs
Distribution: Arch, Scientific Linux, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 4,290

Rep: Reputation: 378Reputation: 378Reputation: 378Reputation: 378
I have a couple of the old 24 port varieties of the BayStack and have never had any problems with them. Let's verify a few things first:

(1) Do you get a LED illuminated on the switch when you plug your cat5 from your workstation to the switch and your workstation is on?

If not, are you using the same cable to connect to the switch as you were to connect directly to the router? If so, it is probably a crossover cable and you need a straight through cable to connect to the switch.

(2) If (1) is OK, what does ifconfig eth0 on your workstation say?

(3) Have you verified that the dhcpd is running on your router? Does it have an illuminated LED on the switch port to which it is connected?
 
Old 11-14-2005, 11:32 AM   #6
baldy3105
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Distribution: Mint (Desktop), Debian (Server)
Posts: 891

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
If you have defaulted the Baystack then all ports will be auto and in the same vlan. The most likely mistake would be that the cable between the router and the switch is the wrong type.

If you has a PC connected to a router with switchports on it as they mostly do, you would need a straight cable. If you then used this straight cable to connect the router and the switch together it wouldn't work.

Just a guess.
 
Old 11-15-2005, 11:50 AM   #7
lil_drummaboy
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Victoria, CANADA!
Distribution: OpenBSD, Slackware, Debian
Posts: 85

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
really? My network starts at a Motorola Modem over straight Cat 5e cable to my 3com HomeConnect 802.11G/5-Port Switch router (http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/d...=3CRWDR100U-72) then going to a Straight-wired 50ft. Cat 5e going to port 1 on my BayStack 350T. So what your saying is that I need a cross-wired cable between my 3com Router and my BayStack?
 
Old 11-16-2005, 11:34 AM   #8
lil_drummaboy
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Victoria, CANADA!
Distribution: OpenBSD, Slackware, Debian
Posts: 85

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
ok, now my switch is connected to the 3com switch/router with a Cat6 crossover to port 1 on the baystack, port 2 going to a staight-wired Cat 5e to a WinXP machine requesting dhcp net config. The baystack is on factory default config, still not working. Is it safe to say the switch is dead? I do know that ports 10 and 13 don't work. Depending on what ports are disabled/enabled, the switch will fail it's port loopback test on reset, until i enable them all and reset. Every reset after will fail port loopback. Is this thing a junker?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slack 10.1 -- Mouse issue / X11 issue Pozican Linux - General 4 04-19-2005 03:44 AM
webmin issue, poss security issue bejiita Slackware 3 11-03-2004 06:07 AM
DNS issue or caching issue? AZDAVE Linux - Networking 7 10-02-2004 12:28 AM
My Nortel Baystack 21 NIC's don't work with linux dopper Linux - Hardware 1 02-29-2004 08:12 AM
Having Issue w/ Truetype fonts - Mozilla Issue clove Linux - Software 4 02-18-2004 08:26 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration