Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi All,
I'm getting to grips with administering my new Redhat 7.3 system, and I'd like some advice on securing it.
I'd like to get something up and running quickly (and hopefully without too much initial configuration) and then learn more about it and refine it for my needs as I go on.
The box will be a web server, for low bandwidth small websites, and no services other than basic http, ftp, ssh (for me only) and mail (and anything other required for a v. basic web serving box) will be required to be accessible from outside.
So far, I've found portsentry as a reasonably option, but this doesn't appear to be maintained any more.
I've been using portsentry and tripwire for the past 18 months or so and haven't found any need for maintenance of either. Portsentry has blocked several hundred would-be invaders in that time, and the tripwire reports I check daily indicate that nothing has gotten through...
It is crucial to learn that, and understand why, security cannot be measured by the result of one application, will not be covered by solely using a firewall or one application and is not a task automatically performed once a month. Security is an attitude towards the systems you manage and networks in general.
Security is not focussing on the opinion on, rating of or usage of any specific applications: that is just the product of knowing which measures to take based on an assessment of what needs securing.
I would like to invite anyone who still thinks security equals a firewall or one application or updating to read the thread I mentioned.
Originally posted by unSpawn It is crucial to learn that, and understand why, security cannot be measured by the result of one application, will not be covered by solely using a firewall or one application and is not a task automatically performed once a month. Security is an attitude towards the systems you manage and networks in general.
I agree fully; my post was intended to indicate that perceived lack of maintenance is NOT a valid reason to dismiss the use of a potentially valuable tool.
To maintain security it's also essential to keep a low public profile (consistent, of course, with one's reason for being on the Internet at all) and to stay up to date on the nature of current threats.
I strongly recommend participation in the "Internet Neighborhood Watch" volunteer effort, which is a worldwide network that automatically collects reports of intrusion attempts, probes, and the like, and when correlation of these reports from multiple sites indicates a serious attack, notifies the source ISP of what is happening. More information about it can be found at http://www.mynetwatchman.com/ (but as I post this, I'm getting a 404 from the URL)...
Originally posted by unSpawn It is crucial to learn that, and understand why, security cannot be measured by the result of one application, will not be covered by solely using a firewall or one application and is not a task automatically performed once a month. Security is an attitude towards the systems you manage and networks in general.
Security is not focussing on the opinion on, rating of or usage of any specific applications: that is just the product of knowing which measures to take based on an assessment of what needs securing.
I would like to invite anyone who still thinks security equals a firewall or one application or updating to read the thread I mentioned.
I entirely agree with that point of view. I do understand the thought process behind a secure system, and at the moment am developing policies for the main administrators of this system. In my case, it's only me who will be directly logging on to my system, and the box will be very basic in terms of uses (limited to simple web hosting). I've already explored firewalls from my ISP, and they're out of the price range of this application, so outside of the bounds of 'policy', which I think is an extremely valid, but separate issue, I'm now looking for applications and ways to configure my system inside my specific time, skill, and budget limitations.
I don't want to do a lot of reading, but while I know this isn't a great thing, it's a fact, and I want to get the maximum security from the time I do have to invest.
It's worth bearing in mind that many people have 'real life' applications like me, and just want to get a result that while it is not perfect, is a result that will work, protect against common vulnerabilities, and make an out-of-the-box system more secure than it was before.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.