LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 07-25-2019, 10:04 PM   #1
Fox's Mercantile
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2019
Location: Ranger, TX
Distribution: Linux Mint 19.1
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
AT&T U-verse LAN on eth0 subnet on eth1


I've been using google for the past month trying to find a simple answer for routing. I haven't had any luck, so here I am.

This is what I have:
eth0 is connected to the AT&T LAN from their router/modem.
The modem is 192.168.1.254
The DHCP information giving to the Linux box 192.168.1.175.
By itself, this works fine. Full connectivity to the inter-tubes.

Because I'm a masochist, I work with Cisco phones.
To facilitate this, I added a second network card eth0.
With a static address of 192.168.10.1
And have my (Linux) DHCP server pointed at eth1.

I've been playing off and on with Linux since the days of recompile the kernel daily. But I never got into routing.

I use a MacBook to check connectivity, because it just works and it's simple.

If I connect it to eth1 (though a 5-port switch) It doesn't get any DHCP from the Linux box. Even if I give it a static address 192.168.10.10, I can't ping the Linux box, and vice versa.

Obviously, I'm missing something here.

At the very least, I would like the 192.168.10.x sub-net to work.
Added bonus would be being able to access the inter-tubes from it.

So, which breed chicken do I have to paint yellow and blue, put in a paper bag and wave around over my head?

Using:
/etc/network/interfaces
and
/etc/iproute2/rt_tables

Thank you in advance.
Jeff
 
Old 07-27-2019, 06:21 PM   #2
teckk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: FreeBSD Arch
Posts: 2,335

Rep: Reputation: 513Reputation: 513Reputation: 513Reputation: 513Reputation: 513Reputation: 513
I answered your other thread.
 
Old 07-27-2019, 06:38 PM   #3
scasey
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Distribution: CentOS 7.6
Posts: 3,786

Rep: Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276
Me too, https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...s0-4175658065/
.duplicate reported
 
  


Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AT&T U-verse LAN on enp4s0 subnet on enp6s0 Fox's Mercantile Linux - Networking 10 08-06-2019 10:11 AM
U-Verse "requires" separated LAN for TV vs. data SaintDanBert Linux - Networking 29 10-14-2014 01:18 PM
Production server with static IPs on eth0 and eth0:1 - need private LAN on eth1 stardotstar Linux - Networking 8 07-03-2010 12:27 AM
Firewall WAN eth0 LAN eth1 self-bridges, eth0 does all routeing. Nichole_knc Linux - Networking 5 07-29-2004 02:33 PM
Kernel 2.4.22 finds eth0 and eth1 but 2.6.0 does not find eth1 coollink Linux - Networking 3 01-13-2004 07:32 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration