Linux - Laptop and NetbookHaving a problem installing or configuring Linux on your laptop? Need help running Linux on your netbook? This forum is for you. This forum is for any topics relating to Linux and either traditional laptops or netbooks (such as the Asus EEE PC, Everex CloudBook or MSI Wind).
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Tinkering with different distros on my laptop, I found some situations where I could not connect to my office wi-fi. I think I have finally traced it to their use of "$$" as part of the ESSID. On the home network, I can duplicate the problem by putting "$$" into the ESSID on the router, and then re-configuring the laptop.
(I did find one application which was OK with $$ in the ESSID--I now need to backtrack to see which one it was.....perhaps I should learn to keep notes.....)
Does anyone know of some common denominator in the lower-level SW that would account for this behavior? And any way to fix it?
The probability of my organization changing the wireless ID to accommodate a few Linux users: ~0.01%
Distribution: Distribution: RHEL 5 with Pieces of this and that.
Kernel 2.6.23.1, KDE 3.5.8 and KDE 4.0 beta, Plu
Posts: 5,700
Rep:
For the most part in Networking going back many years no matter of the type OS it is best to use standard characters a-z, 0-9 for naming. Makes life easier when crossing platforms.
For the most part in Networking going back many years no matter of the type OS it is best to use standard characters a-z, 0-9 for naming. Makes life easier when crossing platforms.
Brian
Cool, now its you and I against my IT dept. (I still think we're going to lose....)
I found one app that doesn't care about the $$---Gnome NetworkManager on Fedora. Curiously, Gnome on Ubuntu doesn't work. (I did not check if it was also NetworkManager.)
PS--partially off-topic.
Assuming that it works in the office, this makes Fedora the ONLY distro which has Wireless and Power management working out of the box. Anyone know the secret?
Better gui tools? I always thought that behind the scenes everything was using iwconfig .
Can you put the ssid in quotes and have it work? Or if you try to run it through wpa_supplicant maybe?
<edit>
Actually now that the coffee is kicking in, I bet you need to escape the $ character. Since $ means something in most shells, that is probably where the difficulty is happening. So I'm guessing quotes or \ might do the trick.
</edit>
Hangdog---you are a flipping genius!!! I am forever in your debt.
I had tried single and double quotes to no avail. However "\$\$" works! A quirk is that the application (wi-fi radar, in this case) auto-detects the broadcast (ESSID = herring$$), If I try to configure that and change the ESSID, it won't let me. I have to create a new profile with ESSID = herring\$\$.
I cannot wait to get to the office to see that it works there.....
Now to understand more about suspend when the lid is closed.....
Now that you've figured it out, I wonder if this isn't one of those little tricks people can use to make it really difficult to associate with a AP. Of course I bet Windows doesn't have a problem since it isn't going through shell commands.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.