LinuxQuestions.org - Kernel compilation problems, distorted video and kernel panic

- Linux - Laptop and Netbook (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-laptop-and-netbook-25/)

- - Kernel compilation problems, distorted video and kernel panic (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-laptop-and-netbook-25/kernel-compilation-problems-distorted-video-and-kernel-panic-352590/)

Kernel compilation problems, distorted video and kernel panic

Evening all,

I've just attempted to compile a 2.6 kernel for a Slackware 10.1 installation on my Toshiba Satellite 1800 laptop - the default 2.4 kernel being the only thing stopping me from using it as my main distro.

I compiled it as per the instructions in the Slacker's Bible and both making and installing went without a hitch.

I also did as suggested and installed the kernel to a different directory than /boot (/test in this case), pointing lilo towards it, in order to avoid overwriting the existing kernel.

However, I now have two problems:

Despite my original kernel being unchanged, selecting it now gives me a kernel panic. Message is:

Code:

Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(3,4)

I'm a bit confused about this error seeing as the contents of /boot haven't changed and neither has the lilo entry for this kernel.

My second problem is when booting the second kernel
When selecting 'test' in Lilo (the new kernel) it boots successfully but with severe graphical distortions (as if the screen is repeating itself several times). Screenshot here (58k).

It's still possible to reach the CLI and, typing blind, launch X. The funny thing is that X loads perfectly and runs normally with no display problems at all.

For the record, I tried this procedure once before and this happened on my previous attempt. I was much less aggressive this time at paring down kernel size in the hope that would fix it, but obviously it didn't work! And I'm still puzzled why it's affecting my original setup.

Any explanations for this behaviour or advice on how to fix would be very welcome! Thanks in advance. :)

post your lilo.conf here

also i would recomed you tacking backup of lilo.conf before u do any changes

Thanks for the speedy response.

Here's the contents:

Quote:

# LILO configuration file
# generated by 'liloconfig'
#
# Start LILO global section
boot = /dev/hda
#compact # faster, but won't work on all systems.
prompt
timeout = 300
# VESA framebuffer console @ 1024x768x256
vga = 773
# Normal VGA console
# vga = normal
# VESA framebuffer console @ 1024x768x64k
# vga=791
# VESA framebuffer console @ 1024x768x32k
# vga=790
# VESA framebuffer console @ 1024x768x256
# vga=773
# VESA framebuffer console @ 800x600x64k
# vga=788
# VESA framebuffer console @ 800x600x32k
# vga=787
# VESA framebuffer console @ 800x600x256
# vga=771
# VESA framebuffer console @ 640x480x64k
# vga=785
# VESA framebuffer console @ 640x480x32k
# vga=784
# VESA framebuffer console @ 640x480x256
# vga=769
# ramdisk = 0 # paranoia setting
# End LILO global section
# Linux bootable partition config begins
image = /boot/vmlinuz
root = /dev/hda4
label = Linux
read-only # Non-UMSDOS filesystems should be mounted read-only for checking
# Linux bootable partition config ends
# Windows bootable partition config begins
other = /dev/hda1
label = Windows
table = /dev/hda
# Windows bootable partition config ends
# Linux 2.6 bootable partition config begins
image = /test/vmlinuz
root = /dev/hda4
label = test
read-only
# 2.6 config ends

And I'll remember to backup next time :)

Edit - quick change of the occasional missed 'space' in the file, no change in symptoms after the correction.

well W.R T to your lilo.conf u surely have different vmlinuz file
further i would like to have a look at the O/P of

ls -l /boot
ls -l /test

regards

Thanks for the help, and thanks for telling me about the -l switch, never used that before, it's handy!

I believe you've stumbled on the root of the problem, it looks like it's installed in /boot as well as a little bit in /test.

Quote:

root@darkstar:~# ls -l /boot
total 2290
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 2005-08-12 00:18 README.initrd ->
/usr/doc/mkinitrd-1.0.1/README.initrd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2005-08-12 13:11 System.map ->
System.map-generic-2.6.10
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 805590 2005-01-22 21:07 System.map-generic-2.6.10
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 512 2005-08-12 00:42 boot.0300
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 512 2005-08-12 17:55 boot.0800
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 2005-08-12 13:11 config ->
config-generic-2.6.10
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50545 2005-01-22 21:07 config-generic-2.6.10
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5032 2004-05-21 07:19 diag1.img
-rw------- 1 root root 47616 2005-08-12 20:35 map
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2005-08-12 13:11 vmlinuz ->
vmlinuz-generic-2.6.10
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1413281 2005-01-22 21:07 vmlinuz-generic-2.6.10

Quote:

root@darkstar:~# ls -l /test
total 2242
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 790130 2005-08-12 17:55 System.map
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1503130 2005-08-12 17:55 vmlinuz

I guess that explains why my original boot option is screwing up. Is this situation basically non-salvagable? (A reinstall isn't a big deal yet - it's a clean system) I'll try following the guide the long way through and copy the files manually next time, perhaps that might stop it happening again...

what commands did u run to compile ur kenrel

copying the files manually is more easy and safe

You can try and re-install the kernel from slack CD and where is your 2.4 kernel??

i cannot see that in /boot
did u install the 2.6 kernel from the slack CD as well??

regards