Linux - Laptop and NetbookHaving a problem installing or configuring Linux on your laptop? Need help running Linux on your netbook? This forum is for you. This forum is for any topics relating to Linux and either traditional laptops or netbooks (such as the Asus EEE PC, Everex CloudBook or MSI Wind).
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I need advice on a distro for an AMD Toshiba Satelite 2060cds laptop.
Its has 98 ram, 4 gig HD and a 366mhz AMD k6-2 processor.
So far I have tried:
Slitaz, ubuntu lite, ubuntu minimal, kbuntu, feather, mini, damnsmall linux and puppy... and others I cant recall.
I just realised that its probably the AMD architecture that is causing all the problems, so I got Mepis and Mepis lite.
MepisLite eventually installed but is so slow as to be useless.
Puppy worked well, but its a bit of a pain to install it on the HD. I have done it in the past.
Can anyone recommend something that is a bit faster than mepislite?
I dont really want to go back to Win98, but it really was fast by comparison with Mepislite
Remember, I only have 98 meg of ram !
Its a Toshiba Satelite 2060cds, circa 2002 I think?
On machines of similar spec, I typically install a bare bones Debian system (i.e. text only). Then I only install the programs I need as I need them. The real trick is picking a lightweight desktop manager and lightweight applications.
For desktops, I typically use IceWM, but have dabbled w/ Windowmaker, Enlightenment, fluxbox, and XFCE4. I've been wanting to try out LXDE (which is supposedly really slick) from the Lenny repos but don't have an old machine around to play with right now.
For applications, you have to avoid the pigs like Firefox/Iceweasel and Openoffice.org. You may have to give up a little bit of coolness and polish and instead focus on functionality. I still usually just suck it up w/ firefox because I haven't found a browser I like yet. But for openoffice, I use Abiword (sometimes I just nano) and gnumeric. For mail, I use mutt or claws (formerly syphleed-claws I believe). There are numerous lightweight picture viewers, and you can get performance by using other tools only from the command line (like mplayer for music) without a gui.
Additionally, on old machines like yours, you will probably see an improvement by compiling your own kernel. You can cut out support for a bunch of hardware you don't need. The downside is you have to recompile if you use hardware for stuff you cut out. If you do this, there is a "debian way" to compile kernels that will give you a *.deb package to install, which is nice for install/removal.
The other thing I liked about this build-from-the-ground-up method was I learned an awful lot about Debian and about linux in general since I had to get my hands dirty a bit.
*Edited a bit about compiling kernels and whatnot *
You need to know there is a problem with amd-k6 at 350Mhz. Some instruction is exectued much faster on these chips, and M$ windows fell over because the processor was too efficient. Linux patched, and we were fairly OK. But it cab still cause issued. I had one in the 90s. Excuse a link to a hostile web site http://support.microsoft.com/kb/192841
I say this because everyone has forgotten about the AMD K6-350 now and the same errors could reappear. Windows98 crashes reliably on that cpu without a patch, which is probably no longer available.
Both are uClibc based with fewer bells and whistles, and built using uClibc instead the (bloated) glibc
Kevux is one of the wierdest. FHS compliance is nowhere, but it is very secure because of this and other notions which we all might have, but this guy actually got into a distro. YMMV
If you need a standard system, use Slkackware with xfce. Or roll your own
Have you checked out Tinycore-1.4.2; it's the new improved DSL and might work on that old bird-it runs good on my Toshiba 7000CT w/ 160MB RAM and 4GB HD
( http://www.tinycorelinux.com/ )
Oh yeah, one more thing: if you do decide to go with Windows 98, Auto-Patcher is the only way to go after install. It'll do all the updates and reboots without you having to sit there and baby sit.
Oh yeah, one more thing: if you do decide to go with Windows 98, Auto-Patcher is the only way to go after install. It'll do all the updates and reboots without you having to sit there and baby sit.
Thanks guys. I certainly went fast with win 98, but I was hoping to use a linux distro. I have become a bit spoilt with all the ubuntu/mint stuff which does everythign for you.
For less than 128 MB of ream they recommend the following command at boot: al nocache
Looks really nice too. since it's a live CD you can boot from it to test, the entire system runs from RAM and the CD ejects after the system is loaded. if you like it click the menu link to "install to hard drive"
For less than 128 MB of ream they recommend the following command at boot: al nocache
Looks really nice too. since it's a live CD you can boot from it to test, the entire system runs from RAM and the CD ejects after the system is loaded. if you like it click the menu link to "install to hard drive"
Heh heh. I didnt waste a cd on that one. Got a rewritable! I am learning.
This is what i got:
This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU.
pae cmov. Unable to boot - please use a kernel appropriate for your CPU.
Thanks anyway, will put it aside for some of my bigger machines with 128 and 256 ram.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.