Write rate drops drastically near end of benchmark on SK Hynix m.2 NVMe.
Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Write rate drops drastically near end of benchmark on SK Hynix m.2 NVMe.
I don't understand what's happening here. It's a brand new SK Hynix Gold P31 1TB NVMe Gen3 M.2 about 5% full. Long runs with a lot of data are what I was wanting for building Android. This kind of sucks if it falls off like that. Is this normal ? Any way to maintain faster write rate ?
I apologize for the double attachment, it said zero and came out double.
Last edited by tek3195; 03-08-2022 at 11:30 AM.
Reason: apology
Not from what I can see, 64C was the highest it got and don't see any thermal management. I'm still a bit new to this but cache shouldn't have anything to do with write rate or so it would seem. Or maybe it does, I don't know. Second test was worse than first.
Check out toms hardware review. In a nutshell it looks like it takes awhile for the cache to recover in some cases due to its design. Otherwise a good drive.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
