Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
03-07-2006, 01:11 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 5
Rep:
|
working with dual-core CPU
Hello all, I would like to know which is the oldest kernel accepting the dual-core CPUs and from which it is really safe and fast.
|
|
|
03-08-2006, 02:30 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794
Rep:
|
It will require chipset support, so you're talking a 2.6.1x kernel whether you go Intel (955 and later) or AMD (nForce4). I'd go with 2.6.15
|
|
|
03-08-2006, 02:39 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
You don't want and old kernel. You always really should use the latest.
There is no reason not to run 2.6.15.6 unless you want to run win4lin or something...
|
|
|
03-11-2006, 10:52 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 5
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thank you all, and I do not WANT to run an old kernal, but I have one and I don't want to get a new one if it's not necessary.
|
|
|
03-11-2006, 07:08 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
The newer the kernel, the easier it is to deal with IME...
|
|
|
03-12-2006, 01:44 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 5
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by amosf
You don't want and old kernel. You always really should use the latest.
There is no reason not to run 2.6.15.6 unless you want to run win4lin or something...
|
Which seem to mean that 2.6.15.6 is the latest...
So how comes I get 2.6.5-7.201-default when I type uname -r as advised in the "before you post" thread ?
|
|
|
03-12-2006, 03:54 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Germany, Berlin
Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1/9.2/9.3/10.0/10.1, openSuSE 10.2, 10.3, Slackware, Debian, Redhat, BSD
Posts: 315
Rep:
|
because 2.6.5 is older than 2.6.15 ...
|
|
|
03-13-2006, 04:20 AM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 5
Original Poster
Rep:
|
... lol, I was confused because of the decimal writing... 
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|