LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2006, 01:11 PM   #1
Yakyak
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
working with dual-core CPU


Hello all, I would like to know which is the oldest kernel accepting the dual-core CPUs and from which it is really safe and fast.
 
Old 03-08-2006, 02:30 PM   #2
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
It will require chipset support, so you're talking a 2.6.1x kernel whether you go Intel (955 and later) or AMD (nForce4). I'd go with 2.6.15
 
Old 03-08-2006, 02:39 PM   #3
amosf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672

Rep: Reputation: 46
You don't want and old kernel. You always really should use the latest.

There is no reason not to run 2.6.15.6 unless you want to run win4lin or something...
 
Old 03-11-2006, 10:52 AM   #4
Yakyak
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thank you all, and I do not WANT to run an old kernal, but I have one and I don't want to get a new one if it's not necessary.
 
Old 03-11-2006, 07:08 PM   #5
amosf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672

Rep: Reputation: 46
The newer the kernel, the easier it is to deal with IME...
 
Old 03-12-2006, 01:44 PM   #6
Yakyak
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by amosf
You don't want and old kernel. You always really should use the latest.

There is no reason not to run 2.6.15.6 unless you want to run win4lin or something...
Which seem to mean that 2.6.15.6 is the latest...
So how comes I get 2.6.5-7.201-default when I type uname -r as advised in the "before you post" thread ?
 
Old 03-12-2006, 03:54 PM   #7
seelenbild28
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Germany, Berlin
Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1/9.2/9.3/10.0/10.1, openSuSE 10.2, 10.3, Slackware, Debian, Redhat, BSD
Posts: 315

Rep: Reputation: 30
because 2.6.5 is older than 2.6.15 ...
 
Old 03-13-2006, 04:20 AM   #8
Yakyak
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
... lol, I was confused because of the decimal writing...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LFS on AMD dual core 64 bit CPU(S) astender Linux From Scratch 3 02-19-2006 04:53 PM
Fedora Core 4 x86_64 on a Shuttle XPC SN25P with an AMD 64 X2 (Dual core) gwiesenekker Linux - Hardware 4 12-06-2005 11:53 PM
Dual CPU? yelrah Slackware 5 08-05-2005 12:28 PM
Dual processor vs. Dual core cs. single on home machine fincher69 Linux - Hardware 3 03-04-2005 12:37 PM
Dual CPU zer0snr Linux - Newbie 1 04-25-2004 07:54 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration