LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Hardware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/)
-   -   Western Digital RE4 Drives vs Western Digital AV Drives (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/western-digital-re4-drives-vs-western-digital-av-drives-4175487181/)

krazybob 12-07-2013 05:49 AM

Western Digital RE4 Drives vs Western Digital AV Drives
 
I've been using 3GB/s RE4 drives in RAID 1 and have been happy so far. But I've recently learned of the WD AV drives designed for always on streaming. The RE4's have 64MB caches while the AV drives have a 32MB cache. The 3Ware 9550SXU controllers have their own cache.

Are these better drives for servers?

cascade9 12-07-2013 07:03 AM

RE is 'RAID Edition'. The 'AV' drives are rebranded/modififed (with different firmware) WD 'Green Power' drives. BTW, there are 64MB cache model WD-AV drives.

http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=150

For RAID use, the REs are much better. For general non-RAID 'single drive' I'd trust the REs more, but if you arent using RAID then the slightly cheaper WD Black would probably be my choice.

krazybob 12-07-2013 03:35 PM

Green power drives shutdown to save power. AV drives are intended to spin all the time.

cascade9 12-08-2013 03:43 AM

By 'shutdown' I guess you mean 'intellipark'?

The AV drives have intellipark just like the 'Green Power' drives.

The RE/Black drives have a longer warranty, and in the case of the REs, higher load/unload cycles (300,000 vs 600,000) and MTBF (1,000,000 vs 1,200,000).(MTBF isnt listed for the 'black' drives anymore).

http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/librar...879-701250.pdf

http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/librar...879-771444.pdf

http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/librar...879-771434.pdf


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.