Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
07-31-2019, 11:26 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2016
Distribution: Centos 7
Posts: 16
Rep: 
|
Voodoo, S3, Rage and other antique graphics card support in modern linux
I cannot find anything on the web about the current state of support for some of these older cards. I've got a lovely custom gaming computer for old 1995-2003 games, and I'm eyeing a Voodoo 3000 to add to my collection. My question is this: Does -any- modern linux distro still support graphics cards as old as these? And if not, is is realistically possible for a Linux fledgling like myself to recompile the old drivers to work with new distros? I really can't find anything on these cards past 2008 save for some vague anonymous post from 2011 claiming they would no longer be supported in any linux distro due to support being removed from Mesa.
I've got an S3 ViRGE and a Voodoo banshee already, but I do not know if they work and am a bit hesitant to put them in a system. The Voodoo 3000 is pricey, so I would really like to know if it will work before I buy it.
I'm not very skilled in Linux, but I'm willing to put in the effort to learn how and then attempt a recompile for a current version of Linux. Key word: attempt
I currently run 8 operating systems on 8 different SSDs that I swap between at my leisure. 5 are different versions of Windows, 1 is just straight DOS 6.22, and the other two OSs are Fedora WS 30 and Ubuntu 19.10
|
|
|
08-01-2019, 01:17 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 24,244
|
|
|
|
08-07-2019, 12:15 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2016
Distribution: Centos 7
Posts: 16
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I've got my answer. It would seem that no linux past 2.4 had true "support" for the cards, and the few holdouts stopped supporting them in 2010. Any "support" now is just svga passthrough, no hardware acceleration. The only way to get it working would be to write a driver myself, or to just go back to an era-appropriate distro
|
|
|
08-07-2019, 02:06 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitsep
or to just go back to an era-appropriate distro
|
and why not?
Sounds like the best option for such a vintage setup.
Just don't do internet with it.
|
|
|
08-09-2019, 03:02 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,542
|
From a few posts I've followed, it seems that some at least work with linux. I had a nvidia mx400 going on a 32bit legacy nvidia driver until ~2012 at least. Now working is a relative term. It's quite possible that Mesa has dropped them, but mesa has bigger fish to fry these days. Not many of them did very much that mesa can use. X hasn't dropped them Look at this package listing from a recent install cd
Code:
xf86-video-amdgpu-19.0.1-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-mach64-6.9.6-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-sis-20181217_22d3c79-x86_64-1.txz
xf86-video-apm-1.3.0-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-mga-2.0.0-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-sisusb-0.9.7-x86_64-3.txz
xf86-video-ark-0.7.5-x86_64-11.txz xf86-video-neomagic-1.3.0-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-tdfx-1.5.0-x86_64-1.txz
xf86-video-ast-1.1.5-x86_64-5.txz xf86-video-nouveau-1.0.16-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-tga-1.2.2-x86_64-11.txz
xf86-video-ati-19.0.1-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-nv-2.1.21-x86_64-3.txz xf86-video-trident-1.3.8-x86_64-3.txz
xf86-video-chips-1.4.0-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-openchrome-0.6.0-x86_64-3.txz xf86-video-tseng-1.2.5-x86_64-11.txz
xf86-video-cirrus-1.5.3-x86_64-5.txz xf86-video-r128-6.12.0-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-v4l-0.3.0-x86_64-1.txz
xf86-video-dummy-0.3.8-x86_64-3.txz xf86-video-rendition-4.2.7-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-vboxvideo-1.0.0-x86_64-3.txz
xf86-video-glint-1.2.9-x86_64-3.txz xf86-video-s3-0.6.5-x86_64-11.txz xf86-video-vesa-2.4.0-x86_64-3.txz
xf86-video-i128-1.4.0-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-s3virge-1.11.0-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-vmware-13.3.0-x86_64-2.txz
xf86-video-i740-1.4.0-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-savage-20190128_8579718-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-voodoo-1.2.5-x86_64-12.txz
xf86-video-intel-20190301_6afed33b-x86_64-1.txz xf86-video-siliconmotion-1.7.9-x86_64-3.txz
You'd think they'd talk to one another and unsupported drivers would be dropped. You'll have to try it, I think. If I had to go with one, I'd go for nvidia because they probably support their legacy drivers, whereas AMD do not, if my experience with a 2007 RS690 is anything to go by.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|