Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
05-23-2006, 01:43 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: Fedora Core 6
Posts: 38
Rep:
|
Unusual IDE device names
I just installed Fedora 4 on a box with a new motherboard and chip. I used one of my spare 10 GB IDE drives to install Linux on. I then added a 40 GB IDE drive that had a FAT32 partition and a ext3 partition (20 GB each). I was hoping to get access to the ext3 partition but was not counting on it. Then I was going to format the entire drive to ext3.
When I added the drive to my system and booted up linux, the kernel said it was scanning all volumes and has renamed my 10 GB hard drive from hda to VolGroup00-LogVol00 in /dev/mapper and has named my 40 GB drive to VolGroup00-LogVol01 in /dev/mapper. Looking at dsemg it appears that the 40 GB drive is corrupt and probably the cause of the hard drive device name changes.
If I reformat the 40 GB drive will it revert back to a normal naming convention or do I need to take additional steps?
Thanks,
Herman Radtke
Logs posted here...
lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller (rev 02)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 02)00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 02)00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 02)00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev c2)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 02)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) IDE Controller (rev 02)
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801EB (ICH5) SATA Controller (rev 02)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) SMBus Controller (rev 02)
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5500] (rev a1)
02:01.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 536EP Data Fax Modem
02:03.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
dmesg
Probing IDE interface ide0...
hda: WDC WD102AA, ATA DISK drive
hdb: ATAPI DVD-ROM 16X, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
Probing IDE interface ide1...
hdc: MAXTOR 6L040J2, ATA DISK drive
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
hda: max request size: 128KiB
hda: 20044080 sectors (10262 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19885/16/63, UDMA(66)
hda: cache flushes not supported
hda: hda1 hda2
hdc: max request size: 128KiB
hdc: 78177792 sectors (40027 MB) w/1819KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63, UDMA(100)
hdc: cache flushes supported
hdc:<4>hdc: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21
hdc: DMA timeout error
hdc: dma timeout error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hdc1 hdc2 hdc3 hdc4 <<4>hdc: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21
hdc: DMA timeout error
hdc: dma timeout error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hdc5 >
|
|
|
05-23-2006, 06:04 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,552
|
The Fedora 4 default install creates 2 partitions (your hda1, hda2) /boot and a LVM partition ( labeled VolGroup00-LogVol00)that contains / and swap. Your 40GB drive also appears to have a LVM partition which was named VolGroup00-LogVol01. There appear to be 4+ partitons but due do errors I can not tell if there are any logical partitions. Any partition not LVM can be accessed like /dev/hdc1. Without seeing how the drives are actually partitioned this appears to be normal.
The hard drive error could be due to a drive issue with the intel chipset but most likely it is an indication that it is going bad.
|
|
|
05-23-2006, 06:23 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: Fedora Core 6
Posts: 38
Original Poster
Rep:
|
The install is brand new. If I installed Fedora 4 again and manually created my partitions, as opposed to druid, I could get around this?
|
|
|
05-23-2006, 08:54 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,552
|
Yes, BTW LVM stands for logical volume managent. You can google for more info but in a nutshell it allows one to expand storage capacity by adding drives easily.
|
|
|
06-11-2006, 12:44 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
I have a similar problem. Fedora 4, ATA/100 PCI card, 46GB Maxtor with similar errors. I have data I'd like to recover. I also have ATA/133 PCI card with two other drives which are configured under LVM. I'm confident if I get the ATA/100 - 46GB combo working, I can get my data off and then I can rebuild that machine without the problem some 46G drive.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|