LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2009, 03:01 PM   #1
flatstan
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London UK.
Distribution: Linux MINT, UBUNTU.
Posts: 150

Rep: Reputation: 15
Question Understanding Firmware tests SUSE 11.1


I am using this System, and have been running Win XP Pro for some while with no prob's
CPU - AMD Athlon 64 Dual core 6000
Mobo - ASUS M3N-H HDMI
Bios - Phoenix Tech' Ltd. ASUS M3N-H/HDMI ACPI
Revision 0601.26/26/04/2008
SMBIOS Vers' 2.5
Graph. - nVidia GF 8600 GT 1GB Mem
Mem - 2GB.

I decided to install Open SUSE 11.1 on to a 120GB IDE HDD which is not partitioned nor formatted, it is a good drive. I have found in the past that it is best to install SUSE on to an unpartitioned HDD and choosing automatic partitioning.

I booted from the installation DVD, checked the medium OK.
I then ran the firmware test with the following output.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Firmware Tests On AMD Box using SUSE 11.1 installation DVD. 09/09/09

Linux Ready Firmware Developers Kit Release 3 (C) 2007 intel corp.
Result - 5 fail, 1 warn, 13 pass, total 19.

[fail] OS/2 Memory Hole Test
F Memory Map has memory hole between 15MB & 16MB.
[fail] EDD Boot Disk Hinting.
F Boot device does not support EDD.
[fail] DMI information check.
F no SMBIOS nor DMI entry points found.
[fail] CPU frequency scaling tests (1 - 2 mins)
8 CPU frequency steps supported
F supposedly higher frequency is slower on CPU "0"
F supposedly higher frequency is slower on CPU "0"
F supposedly higher frequency is slower on CPU "0"
F supposedly higher frequency is slower on CPU "0"
F supposedly higher frequency is slower on CPU "1"
F proccesors are set to SW_ANY
F firmware not implementing hardware coordination cleanly firmware using SW_ALL instead.
F firmware not implementing hardware coordination cleanly firmware using SW_ANY instead.
[fail] HPET configuration tests
F failed to locate HPET base

[warn] ACPI passive thermal trip points
W zone THRM doesn't support trip points at all.
[info] proccessor microcode update.
kernel to old : the kernel does not export microcode version.
kernel to old : the kernel does not export microcode version.
[info] (experimental) DMA remapping (UT-d) test.
no DMAR ACPI table found.
[info] battery tests.
no battery information present.


(pass) sum virtualisations extensions.
(pass) validate assigned PCI resources.
(pass) MTRR validation.
(pass) PCI express MaxReadReq tuning.
(pass) fan tests.
fan status is on.
(pass) EBDA region.
EBDA region is correctly reserved in the E820 table.
(pass) (experimental) APIC edge/level check.
(pass) general ACPI information.
(pass) DSDT AML verification
tested table DSDT.dsl.
(pass) sun duplicate tests.
tested _SUN ids, successfuly found no duplicates.

more info at HTTP :www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I can't understand any of this except that there are 5 fails & 1 warning, but 13 passes. I followed the link for more info, but could not understand much of that.

Could anyone please help,
I need to know roughly what the results mean,
Which failures that I can ignore safely,
How to solve the failures that need fixing,
Do the warning & info messages need any action.

Thanks.
 
Old 09-09-2009, 09:38 PM   #2
karlatLQ
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 19
Quote:
Our goal for the kit is that it is used to verify that the important platform features are supported on Linux via the firmware, and that there are no "known bad bugs" in the firmware of a machine. By verifying these platform features and checking for known bad issues, we hope to improve the experience of Linux users by preventing interactions between Linux and the firmware on production systems.
From linuxfirmwarekit.org

Are you planning on doing CPU frequency scaling? Run the memory test, to test your memory. The link you posted could explain what the tests are in more detail. It sounds like the tests are more for developers of production systems. Yours is a stand-alone system. Check for hardware compatibility with your system, and if that all seems good then install Suse and run check it.
 
Old 09-14-2009, 01:42 PM   #3
flatstan
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London UK.
Distribution: Linux MINT, UBUNTU.
Posts: 150

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks karlatLQ, no I do not intend CPU frequency scaling, just a straight install of SUSE 11.1. Hardware compat seems OK, so I will go ahead and install. rgds.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Failure to find E100 firmware even though present in /lib/firmware afhartman Linux - Networking 2 07-27-2009 07:31 AM
SUSE 10.0 RC1 Preliminary tests -- so far so good 1kyle SUSE / openSUSE 2 09-12-2005 04:24 PM
prismGT firmware: update not available for suse 9.3 i_s SUSE / openSUSE 3 04-26-2005 06:48 AM
Simple Performance Tests with AMD64 & Suse SML SUSE / openSUSE 3 04-05-2005 10:03 PM
suse 9.1 tests blueice Linux - Distributions 1 04-18-2004 02:13 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration