The mysterious Intel Pentium T2060 processors
I'm currently having these processors in my laptop.If you search the web,like I did,you can find something like;
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Hi, Alan~
Here's a chart from Intel showing the features and capabilities of their line of Pentium dual-core processors. The T2060 is also listed there. And from this site: Quote:
|
install lshw and then try this..
lshw -C processor Then use this chart to view the capabilities of your CPU by determining what the flags mean... http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:...lnk&cd=1&gl=us (alternatives to lshw) dmidecode -t processor cat /proc/cpuinfo |
The output;
Code:
[alan@Alnilam ~]$ su - Also,I've set -march=pentium4 and -mcpu=pentium4 and the speed and performance is really better,so it is a Pentium then. Just found something on the www; Quote:
in the Linux kernel,a technique or something that will allow me to control how much of a processor capacity will be used by a program?I'm not thinking about nice. |
This thread is unreadable in KDE/Konqueror 3.5.8
because of horizontal scrolling caused by wide "Code:" blocks. I don't know if the bug is in Konqueror, LQ, or vBulletin; it doesn't matter -- I can't read & respond intelligently. If you can see your way to editing the triggering "Code:" blocks, I'd love to participate. |
arcthoad6,I did what I can,hope you can see the thread now,but I think that no matter how wide horizontal srolling is that you should be able to see the post in your web browser.I'm not sure,I use Gnome and it was a long time ago when I've used Konqueror but I think it's got something to do with it,not vBulletin or something else.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
BTW, where did those quotations in your OP come from? farslayer's post #3 was very useful & very interesting because of the differences in format & content of the output from the 3 utilities mentioned. "One" could write a short article comparing them. |
Quote:
A few years ago, Pentium was Intel's top of the range 'brand'; Pentium Ds were hot (lots of dissipation), highly clocked, long pipeline parts. When Intel introduced the 'Core' parts, it decided that it had already damaged the Pentium brand and needed a new name, hence the new parts were called something other than Pentium. But then it needed a lower perf/lower price/lower power part, it decided to re-introduce the Pentium brand (in addition to the Celeron brand, which had always been a lower end brand). Now this Pentium was a 'core' part with a lower level of cache and at the slow end of the clock scale, but it had little architectural relationship to the earlier Pentium parts, but a very close relationship to the Core parts but with a few economies (for most people, the cache/clock speed were the biggie, but the VT might be a biggie for you, and I have difficulty in thinking that some of these reductions weren't so much to save Intel money in the production process but an effort to cripple the lower end models to stop them from cannabalising the market for Intel's more profitable versions...marketing, in the worst sense, in other words). |
salasi,what you wrote is really interesting,it made me go and look a little bit deeper,so I found this;
Quote:
And one more; Quote:
The most interesting for me is this; Quote:
archtoad6, I can't remember at the moment were I've found all those qoutes,but typing something like T2060 in google could give you some results.Actually that's what I did right now and I've found this.Some qoutes are from there. Now when I'm thinking about Konqueror,a long time ago when I've used it I had some problems viewing threads in it here on the LQ and that was because long horizontal scrolling lines.Maybe it's vBulletin. I guess Konqueror don't like it,or is the other way? :) No problem with any other browser though. |
Quote:
Well, not really. I think Intel's primary consideration was not letting AMD run away with the low-end market. Remember not all of the 'new Pentium' products were laptop CPUs. It probably cost Intel virtually zero (in comparison) NRE to make these parts available as all that they had to was disable bits of an existing chip/re-run the tape-out program with different parameters, and run test more slowly, so the only real consideration for them is at what price point these chips should sell. Quote:
Indirectly, you can see that from the cache; the earlier, long pipeline, parts were very sensitive to pipeline stalls; hence, the need for the large caches (large for the time, anyway) as without effective caching, pipeline stalls kill the throughput of long pipeline parts. Of course, the usual way that these things go is that new parts are software compatible with all of the 'extensions' (SSE, etc) that previous parts supported and may have more of those features added. So, you would expect, from a high level programmer's view, that the newer parts could look like the older ones. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM. |