LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-23-2005, 04:18 PM   #1
KeTZer
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Suse Linux and only UltraDMA/33?


Hi,

something that always confused me with my OS is that the DMA-Mode Yast-Utility always tells me that my drives are running in UltraDMA/33.
This is a modern machine, so it should use UDMA 100 or 133 I think. At least the HD.
It also doesnīt offer any other options than "DMA off, DMA on, DMA16, UDMA16, UDMA33". I this normal or a compatibility prob with my board?
Itīs not that I have speed issues with my system, but it confuses me.

I also tried to set my HD to UDMA Mode6 (UDMA-100) with "hdparm -X 70 /dev/hda", but it doesnīt change anything. Is this because I only set the drive to udma100 with this and not the controller?


Hereīs my hdparm output for my HD:

Quote:
/dev/hda:
multcount = 16 (on)
IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
unmaskirq = 1 (on)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 256 (on)
geometry = 19457/255/63, sectors = 312581808, start = 0

Hope someone can help me or at least tell me what I miss on that.

Thx in advance,
KeTZer
 
Old 11-23-2005, 11:42 PM   #2
slantoflight
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Smoothwall
Posts: 283
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 35
First off, are you using atleast parallel ATA 80 pin cable? Because If you're using 40 pin, the highest mode you can go to is UDMA 2 which I think is the same as 33. Alot of modern computers still have 40 pin cable even though the harddrive itself is capable of more.

Last edited by slantoflight; 11-23-2005 at 11:43 PM.
 
Old 11-24-2005, 03:05 AM   #3
Lim45
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Northern England
Distribution: Debian Wheezy 64-bit
Posts: 128

Rep: Reputation: 15
From my limited experience of Suse, It would not surprise me if YAST was misreporting the actual speed. Just out of curiosity, run

Quote:
# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda
and post the results. It might be useful to tell us a little about your machine, as well.
 
Old 11-24-2005, 09:17 AM   #4
KeTZer
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 1

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Iīm using 80-pin of course.
I wouldnīt be surprised either if this wasnīt the actual speed (being misreported).

Hereīs the output:
Quote:
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 2636 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1317.92 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 78 MB in 3.05 seconds = 25.59 MB/sec
Iīm not really sure why you want that output as a normal hd wonīt use more than 33mb/s (except for raid, but that uses more than one channel normally), so it actually says nothing.

The controller is the onboard one of the MSI K8TNEO2-FIR, the hd is a samsung spinpoint SP1614N (not sure if itīs udma100 or 133, but that shouldnt be a prob here...), CPU is Athlon 64 3000+ and my Floppy-Drive is a IBM 1,44" (-;
My Kernel is 2.6.13.

Heres also some bootlog stuff:


Quote:
<7>Probing IDE interface ide0...
<4>hda: SAMSUNG SP1614N, ATA DISK drive
<4>ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
<6>hda: max request size: 1024KiB
<6>hda: 312581808 sectors (160041 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=19457/255/63, UDMA(33)
<6>hda: cache flushes supported
<6> hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4
<7>Probing IDE interface ide1...
<4>hdc: TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-M1212, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
<4>hdd: RICOH DVD+RW MP5125, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
<4>ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
<6>hdc: ATAPI 32X DVD-ROM drive, 256kB Cache, UDMA(33)
<6>Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
<6>hdd: ATAPI 32X DVD-ROM CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache, UDMA(33)

Last edited by KeTZer; 11-24-2005 at 09:25 AM.
 
Old 11-24-2005, 10:31 PM   #5
slantoflight
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Smoothwall
Posts: 283
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 35
Yea, 25 mb/s is pretty bad.

The good news is you atleast you know a few basic things that can help solve the problem and you're that much closer now.

We know you're using good? cable so it can't be that.

hdparm is'nt returning operation not permitted errors, so atleast the driver for the chipset, appears to be working correctly. A kernel recompile might even prove to be unneccessary or inefective.


So I guess the last question is, is it just your harddrive or bios harddrive configuration.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which is faster UltraDMA(33) or DMA (normal) Maverick1182 Linux - Newbie 1 10-30-2005 05:11 PM
WindowsXP duel boot with SuSe Linux, SuSe linux not booting? x32825 Linux - Newbie 4 10-12-2004 04:26 PM
SuSE 9.1 Pro or SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9? Mega Man X Linux - Distributions 11 09-24-2004 10:51 AM
SUSE Security Announcement - Linux Kernel (SuSE-SA:2004:009) ima Linux - Security 0 04-19-2004 08:35 AM
ATA 100 or UltraDMA/100...whatever rdaves@earthlink.net Linux - Software 3 09-30-2003 06:49 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration