Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In your opening post you said that you had received an error about sdc. Now that it appears that sdc is in fact your data hdd, it looks as if your system had multiple problems.
Out of pure interest, can you please run sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda? I would just like to see how your disks are set up. We can look at the other 2 disks afterwards...
well I'm not sure about sdc. I wouldn't expect a storage disk to cause boot issues, maybe I copied those infos wrong (I couldn't copy paste)
here are the results of fdisk on sda:
Code:
sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 111,8 GiB, 120034123776 bytes, 234441648 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xace274df
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 1026047 1024000 500M 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 1026048 234438655 233412608 111,3G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda1
Disk /dev/sda1: 500 MiB, 524288000 bytes, 1024000 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x73736572
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1p1 1920221984 3736432267 1816210284 866G 72 unknown
/dev/sda1p2 1936028192 3889681299 1953653108 931,6G 6c unknown
/dev/sda1p3 0 0 0 0B 0 Empty
/dev/sda1p4 27722122 27722568 447 223,5K 0 Empty
Partition table entries are not in disk order.
sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda2
Disk /dev/sda2: 111,3 GiB, 119507255296 bytes, 233412608 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x6c727443
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda2p1 1970237472 3672215697 1701978226 811,6G 75 PC/IX
/dev/sda2p2 1929382413 3883035520 1953653108 931,6G 72 unknown
/dev/sda2p3 0 0 0 0B 0 Empty
/dev/sda2p4 27394442 27394879 438 219K 0 Empty
By the way, do you have any idea why my boot loading time increased that much after the "e2fsck -c /dev/sda1" command? (it gets stuck for a while on the motherboard screen right before grub)
The output to sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda was all that was needed. The output to fdisk -l /dev/sda1 is nonsensical as the individual partitions themselves don't contain MBR partition tables.
Can you do the same for fdisk -l /dev/sdb and fdisk -l /dev/sdc? Many thanks.
That long boot might indicate a hardware issue. But as to why it appeared to begin after a filesystem check and repair, I have no idea to be honest.
Ok well I noticed that during boot time, my PC is making a little humming sound when it's stuck on the asrock screen for like 10-30 seconds.
So I tried switching which disk has grub on it with "sudo grub-install /dev/sdb" and "sudo update-grub" and I noticed something:
Grub found all the linux/memetest etc... almost instantly but it took it a very long time to find windows (like 10-30 minutes) and while it was looking for windows, there was the same sound that I have with the asrock screen during boot time.
So I think there's still something up with that SSD and my long boot time might be grub having a hard time to read the windows partition. Maybe I'll just reinstall windows on the HDD and forget about it.
Yes it is.
Windows and grub where on sda.
I switched grub to sdb to see if it would improve the boot time.
Ah, gotcha. I'm no expert on grub but I'm sure it's still installed on /dev/sda anyway, so there was no "switching" going on, just an additional installation of grub to /dev/sdb. Perhaps you also switched the boot order in your BIOS to boot /dev/sdb first?
Anyway, apart from that, the fact that grub takes so long to find the Windows partition is worrying. That would indicate a problem with your Windows SSD or the connections to it. Can you therefore check the connections again?
The Windows SSD was the one for which we found SMART data that looked worrying (post #13). Is it a fairly new disk? If so, you should look to get it replaced under warranty due to what you're experiencing and the SMART data. If not, you should replace it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.