Should I use a ultra2 SCSI (80 mb/s) for my /usr partition?
Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Should I use a ultra2 SCSI (80 mb/s) for my /usr partition?
I have a 60 gb ata/100 7200 rpm which all my partitions are on right now.
I recently picked up a symbios sym8951u ultra2 scsi card, and a quantum viking ii 4.5 gb scsi hard drive.
If i do lots of multitasking/multiuser stuff, would it be worthwhile to mount my /usr partition on the scsi disk? currently it is about 2gb or so. Or is ultra2 too outdated (i think it's 80 mbps peak).
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,802
Rep:
It sort of depends on your workload. The Ultra2 is by no means unusable (I have a PIII-based system that runs the whole system off an Ultra2 adapter and it works just fine.)
The tough question is whether 4.5GB will be large enough for /usr. So much stuff winds up getting installed under /usr (especially /usr/local/) that it might fill up quickly. One thing that might be useful to stash out on the SCSI disk is additional swap space. Personally, I'd make a second swap partition the same size as whatever you have defined on /dev/hda but you know your swap needs better than anyone. One thing you could do is run "cd / ; du -sk +ACo-" and see: 1.) what would even fit on the SCSI disk and 2.) whether placing such-and-such directory tree on the other drive would help out with any I/O bottlenecks you might be experiencing. A couple of examples... Do you move a lot of mail around? If so, then perhaps moving /var onto the SCSI disk would help (this depends on the mail package you're using so YMMV). Are users writing software that makes a lot of temporary files? If so, then creating a separate filesystem for /tmp on the SCSI disk would be useful.
There are a lot of possibilities on what you could do with that disk. The relatively small size of that drive doesn't mean it's not all that useful, either. Up until quite recently, I had a couple of systems that were running Linux and using only 2GB and 4GB disks for the filesystems containing the OS and utlilties -- the larger disks were for images and database files -- and I never had any real problems. If you ask around, you can probably find other disks that some folks are considering just tossing out which would be right at home hanging off the Symbios card.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.