Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
03-25-2003, 02:42 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 68
Rep:
|
RADEON 9700 and agpgart
I'm running red hat 8.0 and I recently installed Radeon 9700 pro. It was working great and so was the graphics acceleration. I could see that it was working through lsmod. However, i recenly updated the linux kernel through red hat rpm manager and now the agpgart modules is not working. It currenly says unused. Do I need to reconfigure now that I've updated the kernel to red hat's most recent update. Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
03-26-2003, 10:49 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251
Rep:
|
What modifications did the update make to the kernel? Was it a version upgrade? And was it necessary?
In addition I have been having troubles of my own with my new system and a 9700 Pro. What motherboard do you have? I'm currently in the market for one as the one I went with isn't yet supported by the kernel.
thanks,
Barto
|
|
|
03-26-2003, 01:15 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I'm running ASUS p4pe. I haven't had any issues with it. Its actually great. The onboard sound card works well. The onboard raid didn't work and it required use of the new ata connectors. The radeon 9700 pro works great until I updated. The update fixed a problem with the glibc library. I know the driver uses that library. I'm thinking i'll need to reinstall. It probably wasn't necessary for me to upgrade. Before I reinstall, I think i might update the fglrxconfig file first. I'll post if everything goes well. Thanks, j
|
|
|
03-26-2003, 08:20 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251
Rep:
|
Looking at the P4Pe it looks like its not that bad of a board. My only concerns are with the memory and hard drive that I've purchased. The hard drive is a Maxtor ATA133 HD and the memory is a 512 stick of DDR400. Will there be any compatability problems?
|
|
|
03-26-2003, 08:34 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
The board's guide said that all ata as well as ultra ata is supported. I even hooked my western digital 80mb 7200 to a serial to ultra ata adapter and then to the motherboard. It worked. As for your ram, the board doesn't support ddr 400. Only 333. I heard you can use the 400 but it will only run at 333. I haven't tried it though. eastj
|
|
|
03-26-2003, 09:03 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Qc, Canada
Distribution: CRUX
Posts: 317
Rep:
|
You need to rebuild the fglrx.o module to match your new kernel-<version>.
You can either re-install the rpm driver pkg, or go into /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod and run the make.sh script to build the module.
Then backup one dir. [cd ../] and run the make_install.sh script.
Last edited by UnTamed; 03-26-2003 at 09:05 PM.
|
|
|
03-30-2003, 08:56 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks, untamed... That was an easy solution to my problem. J
|
|
|
04-22-2003, 12:29 AM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Fredneck, MD
Distribution: RedHat 8.0
Posts: 17
Rep:
|
Hey, I was hoping that since you got everything working you could maybe help me...? I have a 9700, and I'm trying to get it to work in RedHat 8.0. I reinstalled the driver twice (no updates at all), and tried everything I can. The only problem I'm having now is that it's not doing any acceleration. I tried looking at the display settings GUI and there's an option for 3D acceleration, but it's greyed out and not accessible. XWindows won't start when I try to load the DRI module, saying there's a problem with agpgart and that it can't aquire AGP (not a direct quote).
Any ideas?
Thanks alot
Brian
|
|
|
04-22-2003, 09:19 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251
Rep:
|
if the agpgart module is loading correctly then could it be a permissions problem on /dev/agpgart?
|
|
|
04-22-2003, 12:48 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I had the Same Problem
I had the same problem. If I remember correctly, it was caused by an old libGL component. ATI gave two options:
1) rpm -i --force <ati_package_name>.rpm to force over the mesa-libGL files.
and ....
I did it the second way because they said this is the "more correct way".
2) rpm -e --nodeps XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.2.0-72
rpm -Uhv <ati_package_name>.rpm
I reconfigured using fglrxconfig and rebooted.
When I typed in lsmod, the agpgart was now being used. This solution only works for red hat 8.0.
|
|
|
04-22-2003, 02:07 PM
|
#11
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Fredneck, MD
Distribution: RedHat 8.0
Posts: 17
Rep:
|
I used the first method when I installed it in the first place... I haven't tried the second yet. I do OpenGL development... would it mess that up at all?
Thanks for the reply.
B
|
|
|
04-22-2003, 06:14 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Qc, Canada
Distribution: CRUX
Posts: 317
Rep:
|
In fact the first way [...--force] is better IMHO, since it makes it easier to revert if need be, it doesn't really overwrite the libGL.so.1.2, it backs it up to dri-old-libGL.so.1.2 [...or something like that, I haven't rpm'ed them for a long while] ...but that's a little besides the point anyway since both ways will give the same end result, put Ati's libGL in /usr/X11R6/lib.
As far as your AGP issue is concerned, Slickfty2, some additionnal info will be needed.
Could you post your output to those commands,
dmesg | grep agp
cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log | grep EE
cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log | grep WW
cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log | grep agp
...and also what mobo chipset you're using, if it's a nforce2, don't even bother, the agp interface is only supported through their drivers ...for their [...nVidia] cards.
|
|
|
04-22-2003, 11:14 PM
|
#13
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Fredneck, MD
Distribution: RedHat 8.0
Posts: 17
Rep:
|
I tried your method 2. Same results as before. lsmod doesn't come up with agpgart or dri. I have no idea what's up with that.
I ran those commands. Here's a complete listing of what came out.
[Brian@localhost Brian]$ dmesg | grep 'agp'
[Brian@localhost Brian]$ cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log | grep EE
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
[Brian@localhost Brian]$ cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log |grep WW
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(WW) fglrx: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:0:1) found
(WW) fglrx(0): DRI initialization failed!
[Brian@localhost Brian]$ cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log |grep agp
[Brian@localhost Brian]$
[Brian@localhost Brian]$
I don't honestly know how to check the chipset. It's an ATI Radeon 9700, I think the brand name was Saphire. I almost wonder if it isn't the card itself anyway, as I'm even having some trouble with it in Windows.
Thanks again
B
|
|
|
04-23-2003, 05:09 PM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Qc, Canada
Distribution: CRUX
Posts: 317
Rep:
|
mobo chipset ...motherboard chipset.
The first FireGL drivers that ATI released, wouldn't support "powered by ATI" cards [...3rd party, like Saphire] maybe those new 2.9.6, being a FireGL release, don't either since your card is not even recognized.
Maybe you could see with lspci if your card is in fact on "BusID PCI:1:0:1" and correct it in your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 if it's not, it's been knowned to happen.
|
|
|
04-23-2003, 07:13 PM
|
#15
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Fredneck, MD
Distribution: RedHat 8.0
Posts: 17
Rep:
|
Ahh... Well, I'm using the 2.5.1 drivers, and the XF86Config file doesn't even have the card specified as BusID PCI:1:0:1. When I use the display properties GUI (redhat 8), it recognizes the card as a Radeon 9700, but wants to use the vesa driver. I specified the fglrx driver (not on the list of drivers, had to type it in), but it still won't let me use 3D acceleration. If all else fails, I'm considering switching to a nVidia 4600... I'd love to keep my nice card, but if I can't get it working anyone also have ideas on good linux/windows cards?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|