Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
09-19-2002, 08:49 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Kansas City
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2 and a couple of RH7.3 Apache servers
Posts: 153
Rep:
|
processor speed vs. file server performance
I want to set up a RH7.3 based box to be used strictly as a file server, mainly to house a large volume of MP3's to be accessable from any machine on my network. What affect will processor speed and or amount of RAM have on the speed that clients can access files on the file server.
|
|
|
09-20-2002, 08:28 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Brisvegas, Antipodes
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,590
Rep:
|
Processor speed...bugger all, ram....more ram is always good, network speed is mostly going to depend on your network hardware.
|
|
|
09-20-2002, 08:46 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Kansas City
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2 and a couple of RH7.3 Apache servers
Posts: 153
Original Poster
Rep:
|
The reason I ask is that I was using a 300mhz box with 384meg of ram to run Linux on and It took forever for anything to open, the hard drive would basically just pause. I upgraded to a P4-1.4 with 256 meg and it is night and day differance. So It just seemed to me that the processor was slowing down the hard drive. My network in general is fast enough for me, but I want to set up this extra server to play mp3 files from a central distribution point. I want it to be able to keep up with the client demand since the mp3 files will basically just be streeming across the LAN.
|
|
|
09-20-2002, 08:58 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Brisvegas, Antipodes
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,590
Rep:
|
If it's just a server then you don't need X or any windowmanagers/desktops, these are the apps that slow things down, the gui takes a huge amount of system resources, and it's just not needed for a server.
|
|
|
09-20-2002, 09:11 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Kansas City
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2 and a couple of RH7.3 Apache servers
Posts: 153
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Right, I am going to set this one up just as a server with no GUI because I will be running it headless anyway once its set up. So do you suppose that a p133 with 48 meg should be adaquite for this purpose?
|
|
|
09-20-2002, 09:28 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Brisvegas, Antipodes
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,590
Rep:
|
p133 will be ok, more ram will be better though, try 128.
|
|
|
09-20-2002, 07:59 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700
Rep:
|
The biggest issue with a file server is usually not the network connection unless your are expecting A LOT of clients. 10-Base-T is going to kick out about 1MB/sec. Figure that against a streaming MP3 at around an absolute max of 100k/sec... no problem.
The problems usually come in with disk access. First off, that mobo isn't going to be able to handle a large disk 20GB> without an ATA adapter, and that might not work if the board isn't PCI 2.0 compliant, which it may or may not be, the P133 era is right on the edge of that standard's introduction. RAM is not an issue really at all, no X, no worries, but like Aussie pointed out, this probably runs on EDO, cheap and easy to find used, max the slots!
Right now my house's file server is an old Dualie PPro 180 wirth 64Megs and I have no problems, aside from X+fluxbox is still dog slow... but it hands out NFS and Samba to the three clients it uses just fine.
Cheers,
Finegan
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|