Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
03-18-2005, 12:18 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Rep:
|
Problem mounting RHL9 ext3 drive in FC3
I have installed a secondary drive from my old RHL9 server into my new FC3 server but cannot seem to get the drive to mount. I have made entries to /etc/fstab, tried mounting manually using 'mount -t ext3 /ddev/hdb1 /mnt/data' with no success. I have done this many times before with previous version of RHL, but am very new to FC. Is there something I am missing with FC3?
I receive the following error:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdb,
or too many mounted file systems
-K
Last edited by kassemi; 03-18-2005 at 12:31 PM.
|
|
|
03-19-2005, 10:07 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Fedora Core 3
Posts: 125
Rep:
|
extended 3 might have changed a bit since then, which might cause the problem, but I haven't kept up on extended fs changes.
Have you tried fdisk /dev/hdb and did a p for print partition information. That might lend a clue as to what the problem is. (Might even be the wrong device on the ide chain. hdb is the primary slave)
Worse comes to worse, you can attempt to mount -t ext2 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/point
|
|
|
03-21-2005, 12:11 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I tried to mount as ext2, but same results. fdisk /dev/hdb and a p returns the following:
Disk /dev/hdb: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdb1 * 1 1023 8217243 54 OnTrackDM6
Not quite sure what the OnTrackDM6 System is. I am used to seeing Linux for my others Linux systems.
Any suggestions?
-K
|
|
|
03-21-2005, 04:26 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,477
|
OnTrack is a dynamic disk overlay that was used to overcome motherboard BIOS limitations for large disks.
Try adding:
hdb=remap63
To your bootloader options.
Ref:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO...isk-HOWTO.html
|
|
|
03-23-2005, 11:42 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
The bootloader option worked. Thank you so much michaelk for your reply. I am still not really sure how that drive was setup that way, but at least I can offload data from it now. Would RH9's auto-partitioning setup a large hard drive that way during installation? I am pretty sure I formatted it during install of RH9 way back.
Anyway, thanks again for the help!
-K
|
|
|
03-23-2005, 01:50 PM
|
#6
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,477
|
According to the above link I posted it was automatically recognized in the 2.4 kernel but made an option in 2.5. RH9 would not of formated the drive with DDO. I would guess the DDO would of been already installed when you bought the drive or when you first setup the drive i.e. with the manufacture's supplied floppy disk.
|
|
|
03-23-2005, 08:53 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Must have been installed by the manufacturer. Anyway, thanks again for the info...
-K
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|