NVIDIA + Bumblebee: Failed to build the binaries
I tried to install bumblebee from source following these instructions but failed to build the binaries
https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project...tall-and-usage This is what I did... Code:
# ./configure CONF_DRIVER=nvidia CONF_DRIVER_MODULE_NVIDIA=nvidia CONF_LDPATH_NVIDIA=/usr/lib64:/usr/lib CONF_MODPATH_NVIDIA=/usr/lib64/xorg/modules Code:
# make Code:
some additional info... |
still the same problem ?
4 weeks ago you posted this http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/har...os5-rhel5.html and this here http://www.unix.com/hardware/241684-...os5-rhel5.html and on Dec. 2 2013 you posted this http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...-a-4175486612/ you need a newer kernel than is in the rather old RHEL/CentOS/SL 5.9 ( by the way 5.10 is the current in the old 5 series ) but CentOS , even the curent 6.5 is not a good option on a laptop rhel/cent/sl was never meant to be ran on a laptop.Now some laptops will run it mostly well but some will never be able to install it ( with a gui) . if you MUST use a redhat based distro on a laptop have a look at fedora or maybe even CentOS 6.5 ( but there are no guarantees that cent6 will even fully work or even install on a laptop |
Not the same problem... I managed to configure with correct path but now the build error is different!
Then again, cannot use newer kernels because the software tools I use are based on older stable kernels, although the tools are the latest. And btw centOS 6.x runs just fine on most laptops! Things change with time... if you don't adapt the time will change you. This is true for Linux on laptops and the truth, Intel is losing more than 50% market share fast which they are not ready to admit! |
No one knows the solution?
Is the error only because of the old kernel? |
what version of glibc do you have?
|
glibc-2.5-107.x86_64
glibc-common-2.5-107.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.5-107.x86_64 glibc-headers-2.5-107.x86_64 glib2-2.12.3 glib2-devel-2.12.3 |
i think your glibc are too old, SOCK_CLOEXEC is defined in /usr/include/bits/socket_type.h, present in glibc-2.18
with a fast find, first version is 2.9 with /usr/include/bits/socket.h, this is the minimal upgrade |
Ok thanks, then the next dumb question how can I upgrade my glibc keeping the same kernel. If I can download glibc-2.9 rpm can I simply install it?
|
i don't know how centos packaging works, but i won't upgrade glibc, it's better to install a new version, waiting all things to work good, then delete old libraries; if you have some noise (binaries with shared lib dependencies broken), you can step back easliy.
normally, glibc libraries have symlinks that don't bump it's version, like libm.so.6 -> libm-2.18.so; if in your system, the symlink to libm-2.5.so is libm.so.6, you don't have any problem in upgrading this libraries, as programs will load it using the symlink name. this library is in /lib(64) directory |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 AM. |