Need something faster than an eeebox - have limited power budget
Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Need something faster than an eeebox - have limited power budget
I live on a sailboat now, so I've got a very limited power budget. I've currently got an eeebox EB1012P that I use for movies and stuff. It drives a flat screen TV. I'd like to find something a bit faster in the same sort of physical format, i.e small. Any suggestions?
My sister just got one a few weeks ago and, so far, so good. I installed ubuntu bionic along side windows 10. The gnome desktop mostly works, although the touch pad doesn't work at all and the touch screen and stylus support isn't 100% (left button functions work, hard to get right button functions to work, haven't figured out how to access middle button functions). Fortunately, it works well with either a USB mouse or a bluetooth mouse, so I haven't looked into whether newer kernels might have better support for the hardware.
The 7th gen core i5 should mop the floor of your eeebox's atom. I've got an older atom330/ion acer aspire revo and it's a dog, only useful with media player SW that support HW acceleration on the ION (I use it as a mythtv frontend). The acer switch doesn't have a built in hdmi port, but you can get an adapter to connect it to your TV, like this one: http://www.microcenter.com/product/4...i-port-adapter
The power brick is lower wattage than your eeebox, 45W vs 65W, so it should draw less current, especially if the display is off, because you're using the TV. And if you're the only one watching, I'm sure the switch's display uses less power than your TV. The built in speakers are pathetic, so you'll probably want to use bluetooth or wired sepeakers (it does have bluetooth and an audio jack).
If you want to go really low power and cheap, Raspberry Pi might be an option, but I don't think it would meet your 'Bit faster than the EeeBox' requirement.
Thanks, but I'm really looking for a screenless device like the eeebox. I've got an i5 laptop onboard already, but it's not a good fit for an entertainment machine. I'm looking for nearly the same form factor as the eeebox. I can mount that on the tv or somewhere close to it. I've got an external 4TB drive that has movies etc on it. Doing this with a laptop is just too clumsy.
Personally I would consider a Dell Optiplex 3050 Micro or 3060 Micro. 65 watt power supply, same as your eeeBox. The 3050 is Red Hat-certified and Ubuntu-certified; the new 3060 is not yet certified, but I suspect it might also be capable of running Linux quite well (as long as you use a recent distro).
Personally I would consider a Dell Optiplex 3050 Micro or 3060 Micro. 65 watt power supply, same as your eeeBox. The 3050 is Red Hat-certified and Ubuntu-certified; the new 3060 is not yet certified, but I suspect it might also be capable of running Linux quite well (as long as you use a recent distro).
I was looking at a NUC7I5BNK earlier today. Is anyone running Linux on one? I guess I would really like that kind of power available. But, you can't put a 3.5" HD in it, so I'd still have to run the external drive. As you can see, I'm still figuring out what my real needs are, and I guess a 3.5" HD is one of them.
As far as sipping power, going to an SSD is one of the best ways to reduce the power requirements of a system. Consumer SSD's (as opposed to server level) use drastically less power than a spinning platter drive. Also makes a less powerful system FEEL faster due to the reduced latencies, and since there's no moving parts, they're actually more reliable in case of movement while running.
I was looking at a NUC7I5BNK earlier today. Is anyone running Linux on one? I guess I would really like that kind of power available. But, you can't put a 3.5" HD in it, so I'd still have to run the external drive. As you can see, I'm still figuring out what my real needs are, and I guess a 3.5" HD is one of them.
Why do you need to put a 3.5" drive in it? I'll bet the EeeBox has a 2.5" laptop drive, not a 3.5" desktop drive. I'll also second what Timothy Miller says about SSDs being faster, lower power, and more reliable during movement, like on a boat.
Someone on the Amazon Q&A section for this box said they installed Ubuntu 17.10 on it and said everything seems to be working fine.
Distribution: Mainly Devuan with some Tiny Core, Fatdog, Haiku, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,443
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quakeboy02
.....But, you can't put a 3.5" HD in it, so I'd still have to run the external drive. As you can see, I'm still figuring out what my real needs are, and I guess a 3.5" HD is one of them.
If you're looking to save power, then don't use an external 3.5" drive, use a 2.5" SSD, powered from the USB sockets of whatever computer you decide to get.
I was looking at a NUC7I5BNK earlier today. Is anyone running Linux on one? I guess I would really like that kind of power available. But, you can't put a 3.5" HD in it, so I'd still have to run the external drive. As you can see, I'm still figuring out what my real needs are, and I guess a 3.5" HD is one of them.
I personally had very bad luck with Linux on NUC, and I ended up returning it as a dissatisfied customer. But, that was an older generation; perhaps newer generations have solved these bugs?
If you do decide to go the NUC route, there are a few important things to keep in mind:
NUC's are low-performance machines with 2-core laptop CPU's. Basically the "guts" of a 13" MacBook.
NUC's are sold as kits. Some assembly is required. You'll need to supply your own RAM, storage drives, etc.
Because it is a kit, whether or not the finished product is even usable depends on your skill choosing the right parts and assembling them. Don't expect the kind of support you'd get buying a complete system from a vendor like Dell, HP, or Lenovo.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.