Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
10-25-2022, 04:18 PM
|
#16
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, OS/2, others
Posts: 6,502
|
Radeon 9000 rv200 series
Prices take a big jump for 9500 and above, rv300 series.
Xorg's ATI/Radeon driver officially supports these, but does better with rv300, a much improved technology, than rv200.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
10-25-2022, 07:32 PM
|
#17
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2022
Posts: 119
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well this falls under the what the hell category. Why is Linux seeing a different MB? I double check my receipt, the box, the owners manual and the UPC label and all listed A7N8X. Found nothing on MB until I pulled off a quality control sticker and..wait for it..NF61S-M2B-TE.
https://www.memory4less.com/images/p...1S-M2TE-lg.jpg
That looks identical to my MB. The specs, who knows as even my ASUS owners manual pic doesn't look the same and wrong # of slots and says 3GB ram max, but has 3 slots in manual, mine has 2.
Maybe this explains the driver issue, if not and I really have 4GB ram capacity that's an option. Also, Asus manual may be wrong again and I have a PCI-e slot? Much easier to get a graphics card in that format I think. Never seen anything like this before. Maybe Biostar was part of Asus/Nvidia some time?
Now who knows what the MB real specs are since the ASUS owner's manual is worthless and incorrect.
Last edited by WhyLinux0; 10-25-2022 at 07:54 PM.
|
|
|
10-25-2022, 07:45 PM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2022
Posts: 119
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Here are the specs of the Biostar NF61S=M2B-TE:
Socket AM2
AMD 64Architecture enables 32 and 64 bit
CPU
AMDAthlon 64 /Athlon 64FX / Athlon 64 X2
computing
/ Sempron processors
Supports Hyper Transport andCool= n=Quiet
FSB
Supports up to 1GHz Bandwidth
Support HyperTransport
Chipset
GeForce 6100-405
ITE 8716F
Environment Control initiatives,
Super I/O
Provides themost commonly usedlegacy
H/W Monitor
Super I/O functionality.
Fan Speed Controller
Low Pin Count Interface
ITE's "Smart Guardian" function
DIMM Slots x 2
Dual Channel Mode DDR2memorymodule
Main
Each DIMM supports 256/512MB/1GB/2GB
Supports DDR2 400 / 533 / 667 / 800
Memory
DDR2
Registered DIMM and ECC DIMM is not supported
Max Memory Capicity 4GB
Graphics
GeForce 6100-405
MaxSharedVideo Memory is 256MB
IDE
Integrated IDEController
Ultra DMA 33 / 66 / 100 / 133 Bus Master Mode
supports PIO Mode 0~4
SATA II
IntegratedSerial ATA Controller
Datatransfer rates up to 3.0 Gb/s.
SATA Version 2.0specificationcompliant.
LAN
Realtek 8201CL PHY
10 / 100 Mb/s Auto-Negotiation
Half / Full duplexcapability
Sound
ALC662
5.1 channels audio out
High-DefinitionAudiosupport
PCI slot
x2
Supports PCI expansion cards
Slots
PCI Express x16 slot
x1
Supports PCI-E x16 expansioncards
PCI Express x 1 slot
x1
Supports PCI-E x1 expansioncards
On Board
Floppyconnector
x1
Eachconnector supports 2 Floppy drives
Connector
IDE Connector
x1
Eachconnector supports 2 IDE device
SATA2 Connector
x2
Eachconnector supports 1 SATA devices
Front Panel Connector
x1
Supports front panel facilities
Front Audio Connector
x1
Supports front panel audio function
|
|
|
10-26-2022, 01:12 AM
|
#19
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, OS/2, others
Posts: 6,502
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhyLinux0
|
There's no AGP on that motherboard. The white expansion slots are PCI and the green PCIe. So the HD 3450 should do nicely.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
10-26-2022, 02:07 AM
|
#20
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2022
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 312
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhyLinux0
I double check my receipt, the box, the owners manual and the UPC label and all listed A7N8X.
|
These things are completely wrong ore belongs to another elder computer! It's possible that your computer case originally had contained an Asus A7N8X-UAYZ which was later replaced with the Biostar NF61S-M2B-TE.
See the differences between Socket A (e.g. on Asus A7N8X-UAYZ) and Socket AM2 (e.g. on your Biostar NF61S-M2B-TE):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_A
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_AM2
|
|
|
10-26-2022, 12:00 PM
|
#21
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2022
Posts: 119
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Glad to see progress here. I ordered a Radeon HD3450 256MB for $6. That should be a massive improvement over my 128MB onboard shared memory, not that I needed it but will be much nicer and cheap. And now that I know the correct MB, it looks like I can upgrade to 4GB ram from 2GB, also for a few dollars. This will really bring new life to an already fast(on Linux) old computer.
Arnulf- I bought all the components for this computer, including the case, still have the receipt and it shows ASUS A7N8X, so does the box. There is no chance any of this stuff was pre-instaled anywhere. I never even owned or bought a Biostar MB, but now by default own one. This is a mystery. I have the serial # of the MB as listed on the box if there is a way to check but yeah, 100% sure this MB came in my ASUS box. Who knows, odd.
Thanks for the help everyone and I look forward to installing the new card this weekend. I assume Linux will auto-detect the new card or do I have to enter something manually? I'm also assuming that since AMD/ATI seem to be more code friendly to open source that maybe there is a better driver for the HD3450 than the generic one used for my on-board graphics?
Last edited by WhyLinux0; 10-26-2022 at 12:17 PM.
|
|
|
10-27-2022, 02:35 AM
|
#22
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2022
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 312
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhyLinux0
Radeon HD3450 256MB
[…]
I assume Linux will auto-detect the new card
|
First, remove any entries (e.g. in grub.cfg) which disable kernel modesetting and check /lib/firmware. It must contain a subfolder /radeon with files *.bin in it.
Check dmesg output for lines starting with [drm]. For a Radeon HD3450, first related line shoud be something like:
[drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
|
|
|
11-08-2022, 03:32 PM
|
#23
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2022
Posts: 119
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well, got a new in box Radeon HD4350 installed and it does the exact same thing as the Radeon HD3450, red is orange, blue is aqua and green is black. The clarity of print is very good. Still, 256MB of on board shared graphics look 100X better than either video card. Its no longer possible for it being my system or card error, has to be a Linux issue or compatibility. I bought the ATI cards as they were suppose to be a good fit for Linux. My experience has been poor.
Device-1: AMD RV710/M92 [Mobility Radeon HD 4330] vendor: VISIONTEK driver: radeon
v: kernel bus ID: 02:00.0 chip ID: 1002:955f
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.13 driver: ati,radeon unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa
compositor: marco tty: N/A
OpenGL: renderer: AMD RV710 (DRM 2.50.0 / 5.4.0-131-generic LLVM 12.0.0)
v: 3.3 Mesa 21.2.6 compat-v: 3.0 direct render: Yes
display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: RV710/M92 [Mobility Radeon HD 4330]
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0
version: 00
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress msi vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=radeon latency=0
resources: irq:24 memory:e0000000-efffffff memory:fdce0000-fdceffff ioport:bc00(size=256) memory:c0000-dffff
me@Random:~$ lsmod | grep radeon
radeon 1474560 12
i2c_algo_bit 16384 1 radeon
ttm 106496 1 radeon
drm_kms_helper 184320 1 radeon
drm 495616 9 drm_kms_helper,radeon,ttm
me@Random:~$ glxinfo -B
name of display: :0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
Extended renderer info (GLX_MESA_query_renderer):
Vendor: X.Org (0x1002)
Device: AMD RV710 (DRM 2.50.0 / 5.4.0-131-generic, LLVM 12.0.0) (0x955f)
Version: 21.2.6
Accelerated: yes
Video memory: 512MB
Unified memory: no
Preferred profile: core (0x1)
Max core profile version: 3.3
Max compat profile version: 3.0
Max GLES1 profile version: 1.1
Max GLES[23] profile version: 3.0
Memory info (GL_ATI_meminfo):
VBO free memory - total: 511 MB, largest block: 511 MB
VBO free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Texture free memory - total: 511 MB, largest block: 511 MB
Texture free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Renderbuffer free memory - total: 511 MB, largest block: 511 MB
Renderbuffer free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Memory info (GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info):
Dedicated video memory: 512 MB
Total available memory: 1533 MB
Currently available dedicated video memory: 511 MB
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: AMD RV710 (DRM 2.50.0 / 5.4.0-131-generic, LLVM 12.0.0)
OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 21.2.6
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 21.2.6
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
OpenGL context flags: (none)
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 21.2.6
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.00
Last edited by WhyLinux0; 11-08-2022 at 06:30 PM.
|
|
|
11-09-2022, 03:06 PM
|
#24
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2022
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 312
Rep: 
|
Both Radeon HD3450 and Radeon HD4350 are not generally problematic with Linux. I'm using both cards in different old systems without any errors or color mismatch. Therefore it looks like a compatibility issue with your system and Radeon HD cards, or something goes wrong during driver load. I don't now anything about performance of your distro kernel which necessarily uses "late KMS". I'm using Slackware with self compiled vanilla kernels with "early KMS" included. Compiling a kernel that fits to your hardware may be a solution.
|
|
|
11-09-2022, 04:09 PM
|
#25
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2022
Posts: 119
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yeah that was one of the options I was thinking about. I just upgraded to 4GB ram with no issue so I have more distro options now. Mint should be well rounded. There are PPA driver sites that claim to have drivers that work, not familiar with them, some say PPA's are unsafe, but the driver or a kernal issue seems most likely and more complex than I wanted.
This is one of them: https://launchpad.net/~oibaf/+archiv...aphics-drivers
Last edited by WhyLinux0; 11-09-2022 at 11:44 PM.
|
|
|
11-11-2022, 08:27 PM
|
#26
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, OS/2, others
Posts: 6,502
|
That both 3450 and 4350 work similarly improperly for you, yet for me and others with same or related ATI models correctly, suggests strongly a configuration or hardware or compatibility problem with your PC. My 3450 and my 4650 work fine with multiple versions of Mageia, openSUSE, Debian, Fedora and others, all using both radeon and modesetting FOSS drivers exclusively.
Could it be there is some residue from having used the onboard NForce/NVidia graphics that still hasn't yet been eradicated?
What does
Code:
ls -Ggh /etc/X11/xorg*
show?
|
|
|
11-12-2022, 06:29 AM
|
#27
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2022
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 312
Rep: 
|
An easy (and cheap) solution for this "old computer" is to switch to another mainboard with following specs: - Socket AM2 XOR Socket AM2+: This enables reuse of your AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ and its cooler.
- No chipset integrated graphics device!
- PCIe x16 slot: Both Radeon HD3450 & HD4350 should work on a Socket AM2 or Socket AM2+ mainboard.
- 4 DIMM slots for DDR2 RAM modules: This gives you 6 GiB RAM by reuse of your 2× 1 GiB + 2× 2 GiB DDR2 RAM modules.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
11-12-2022, 12:21 PM
|
#28
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2022
Posts: 119
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I've been looking at the Bios settings, especially PCI-e, once again for a solution. I now get 2 devices listed:
Graphics: Device-1: NVIDIA C61 [GeForce 6100 nForce 405] vendor: Biostar Microtech Intl Corp
driver: nouveau v: kernel bus ID: 00:0d.0 chip ID: 10de:03d1
Device-2: AMD RV710/M92 [Mobility Radeon HD 4330] vendor: VISIONTEK driver: radeon
v: kernel bus ID: 02:00.0 chip ID: 1002:955f
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.13 driver: ati,nouveau,radeon
unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa compositor: marco tty: N/A
OpenGL: renderer: AMD RV710 (DRM 2.50.0 / 5.4.0-131-generic LLVM 12.0.0)
v: 3.3 Mesa 21.2.6 compat-v: 3.0 direct render: Yes
The other result:
ls -Ggh /etc/X11/xorg*
ls: cannot access '/etc/X11/xorg*': No such file or directory
|
|
|
11-12-2022, 12:24 PM
|
#29
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2022
Posts: 119
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arnulf
An easy (and cheap) solution for this "old computer" is to switch to another mainboard with following specs: - Socket AM2 XOR Socket AM2+: This enables reuse of your AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ and its cooler.
- No chipset integrated graphics device!
- PCIe x16 slot: Both Radeon HD3450 & HD4350 should work on a Socket AM2 or Socket AM2+ mainboard.
- 4 DIMM slots for DDR2 RAM modules: This gives you 6 GiB RAM by reuse of your 2× 1 GiB + 2× 2 GiB DDR2 RAM modules.
|
What is a model # of this MB and I will look. Would prefer to find a fix here as it seems it is a glitch somewhere and if found, a lot easier, but definitely a good idea/option if I need to take that route, thanks.
|
|
|
11-12-2022, 02:13 PM
|
#30
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2022
Posts: 119
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmazda
That both 3450 and 4350 work similarly improperly for you, yet for me and others with same or related ATI models correctly, suggests strongly a configuration or hardware or compatibility problem with your PC. My 3450 and my 4650 work fine with multiple versions of Mageia, openSUSE, Debian, Fedora and others, all using both radeon and modesetting FOSS drivers exclusively.
Could it be there is some residue from having used the onboard NForce/NVidia graphics that still hasn't yet been eradicated?
What does
Code:
ls -Ggh /etc/X11/xorg*
show?
|
Some old settings may very well be an issue as the more I read about this, there should usually be no bios changes for installation on a pci-e card. The MB should recognize it automatically. That leaves a software issue in a driver or an odd bios setting I can't find.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|