Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have a Pentium 166 with 128MB RAM and 2.1GB HD, running Slackware 8.1. I am thinking about buying an IDE CD burner to install in it. Would this system be fast enough to reliably burn a CD in a decent amount of time?
If so, can anyone recommend some simple burning software that would run well on this system? I'd mainly use it for data storage, but I would like to be able to burn ISO images and music CDs.
Thanks for the suggestions. However, I guess I shoulda mentioned that this machine does not have KDE or Gnome. Only Windowmaker. I suppose command line tools would work fine.
But, is my system fast enough to burn a CD in a reasonable amount of time?
Well, I never had any problems with my 8x burner in a 300mhz celeron, but then that's not quite 166, is it?
It's hard to say without trying it.
A cd burner can hardly ever go to waste, anyway Do you have another machine you could use it in if your results weren't quite as good as you'd hoped?
I'm inclined to say that the machine should work just fine for burning cds. I would stick to the command line for it though, to avoid unnecessary overhead. the GUI tools are just front-ends to the command line apps anyway.
hi dunno if this helps but i have been burnin cd's on a p1 166mzh with 32 mb of ram but with windows for years and i have also burned cd's on a 486 with windows 95 and 32 mb ram mainly cause linux wth a x windows system dont work on them so stuck with windows lol damn ram been expensive and to date i have only lost 1 cd i think an that was due to the bloomin IDE cable of all things comming loose in the back of the cd-rw and fixed and burnin way again
pete
I may be a newb but i am an oldtimer @ heart
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tech_Master IgnitionProject.com
ignitionServer an IRCX server for the Win32 platform.
Help and Support
Fedora Core 1 + Windows XP + Windows ME + Windows 98 + Windows 95
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The CPU speed is adequate for burning. The internal bus speed is probably 60Mhz, regardless of the CPU speed. The IDE bus gets a fraction of the internal bus. So, buy your drive, it shoud work just fine.
burncenter http://alx14.free.fr/burncenter/ is an easy to use text based burning program. I use it, it's great for not loading X, and it has menus and everything to make the process simpler
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.