LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-13-2005, 01:45 AM   #1
apogee
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Lightbulb Linux web server ,distro & suggested hardware


Hello ,

I have 2 identical IBM boxes for use with Linux.
Each one has
Pentium III 450Mhz , S3 VGA on board ,10/100 LAN card ,CD or DVD drive too.
These boxes obviously use the same type of memory so I have
2 X64MB and
2 X168MB chips available for BOTH of them.

I would like to set web server using apache.I also have got latest Debian [full on 2 DVDs], which I decided not to use ,because I couldn't set the S3
[Yes I am an experienced Linux user ,just don't care really probe and editing text files just to get it work,I prefer using another Distro like Suse's]

Right now I don't want to byu more memory for these.I am also considering buying a new box for use with it ,so I prefer to pay for it.

Questions

1.What do you think is best
a. 1x256MB & 1x128MB or
b. 2x192MB
???

2.What are your experience for AMD Athlon64 with Linux in terms of stability ???
nyone using the X2 version ??

3.for these 2 450Mhz boxes how 192MBS sounds for server apps ???

Thanks gyus
 
Old 08-13-2005, 02:40 AM   #2
musicman_ace
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, RHEL, Slack
Posts: 1,555

Rep: Reputation: 46
Re: Linux web server ,distro & suggested hardware

Quote:
Originally posted by apogee
Questions

1.What do you think is best
a. 1x256MB & 1x128MB or
b. 2x192MB ???

2.What are your experience for AMD Athlon64 with Linux in terms of stability ???
nyone using the X2 version ??

3.for these 2 450Mhz boxes how 192MBS sounds for server apps ???

1. I've never seen 192MB sticks of RAM, so I'll suggest teh 256MB and 128MB combo

2. I tested the Fedora, SusE and Gentoo x86_64 versions and none were stable enough for me to use in a server environment. The most stable was gentoo, but I still had issues with software packages being fairly up-to-date. On all distros, I downloaded the full sources from kernel.org rather than using their stock kernels

3. Depending on the CPU load, network load, and their storage bus speeds, they should be able to handle being office servers or home usage. If this is for a company with more than 100 employees, or a website that is going to be producing a lot of traffic, I'd question the memory and storage aspects more than processor speeds.
 
Old 08-13-2005, 02:47 AM   #3
SlackerLX
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Herzliyya, Israel
Distribution: SuSE 10.1; Testing Distros
Posts: 1,832

Rep: Reputation: 47
Well, in fact, IBM recommends SuSE as server.
Runs quite good on my box
 
Old 08-13-2005, 05:21 AM   #4
apogee
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I haven't see any 192mb RAM Chips too.
What I mean is 1x 64MB + 1x128 =192 mb RAM :-)
 
Old 08-13-2005, 06:38 AM   #5
codec
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: mad.es.eu
Distribution: ubuntu 5.04 knoppix Slack91/10 freebsd51 vector4 redhat9
Posts: 304

Rep: Reputation: 30
Depend on the load of traffic and purpose, but I guess it's better to have more ram in a server.

If you serve something like static pages on a small load environment. Try to use the 192Mb configuration first. Do not load X, it's unecessary on a server
 
Old 08-13-2005, 11:29 PM   #6
Kahless
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Pennsylvainia
Distribution: Slackware / Debian / *Ubuntu / Opensuse / Solaris uname: Brian Cooney
Posts: 503

Rep: Reputation: 30
If you arent running X on the machine, you shouldnt break a sweat running web servers on thoes two boxes, even with only 128 megs of ram each.

a pentium 200 mmx with 64 megs of ram can saturate a t-1.


I have three multi-gigahertz boxes with a gig of ram each here, and I still use an old imac 233 with 48 megs of ram for my web server. The bottleneck is definatly my outbound bandwidth, not the speed of the machine.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Linux distro for Web Server? and configuration too... pulsorock Linux - Enterprise 16 11-30-2005 09:10 AM
Home Web Server Hardware purelithium Linux - Hardware 5 11-26-2005 08:33 PM
gateway pc & web server which linux? jmpmjmpm Linux - Networking 3 03-09-2005 07:35 AM
What is the most popular Linux distro for running a web server? kau2 Linux - General 4 01-10-2005 03:08 PM
Linux Web Development Server, What Distro? Gear_freak2000 Linux - General 3 07-07-2004 03:06 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration