Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
08-13-2005, 02:45 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
Rep:
|
Linux web server ,distro & suggested hardware
Hello ,
I have 2 identical IBM boxes for use with Linux.
Each one has
Pentium III 450Mhz , S3 VGA on board ,10/100 LAN card ,CD or DVD drive too.
These boxes obviously use the same type of memory so I have
2 X64MB and
2 X168MB chips available for BOTH of them.
I would like to set web server using apache.I also have got latest Debian [full on 2 DVDs], which I decided not to use ,because I couldn't set the S3
[Yes I am an experienced Linux user ,just don't care really probe and editing text files just to get it work,I prefer using another Distro like Suse's]
Right now I don't want to byu more memory for these.I am also considering buying a new box for use with it ,so I prefer to pay for it.
Questions
1.What do you think is best
a. 1x256MB & 1x128MB or
b. 2x192MB
???
2.What are your experience for AMD Athlon64 with Linux in terms of stability ???
nyone using the X2 version ??
3.for these 2 450Mhz boxes how 192MBS sounds for server apps ???
Thanks gyus
|
|
|
08-13-2005, 03:40 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, RHEL, Slack
Posts: 1,555
Rep:
|
Re: Linux web server ,distro & suggested hardware
Quote:
Originally posted by apogee
Questions
1.What do you think is best
a. 1x256MB & 1x128MB or
b. 2x192MB ???
2.What are your experience for AMD Athlon64 with Linux in terms of stability ???
nyone using the X2 version ??
3.for these 2 450Mhz boxes how 192MBS sounds for server apps ???
|
1. I've never seen 192MB sticks of RAM, so I'll suggest teh 256MB and 128MB combo
2. I tested the Fedora, SusE and Gentoo x86_64 versions and none were stable enough for me to use in a server environment. The most stable was gentoo, but I still had issues with software packages being fairly up-to-date. On all distros, I downloaded the full sources from kernel.org rather than using their stock kernels
3. Depending on the CPU load, network load, and their storage bus speeds, they should be able to handle being office servers or home usage. If this is for a company with more than 100 employees, or a website that is going to be producing a lot of traffic, I'd question the memory and storage aspects more than processor speeds.
|
|
|
08-13-2005, 03:47 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Herzliyya, Israel
Distribution: SuSE 10.1; Testing Distros
Posts: 1,832
Rep:
|
Well, in fact, IBM recommends SuSE as server.
Runs quite good on my box
|
|
|
08-13-2005, 06:21 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 16
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I haven't see any 192mb RAM Chips too.
What I mean is 1x 64MB + 1x128 =192 mb RAM :-)
|
|
|
08-13-2005, 07:38 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: mad.es.eu
Distribution: ubuntu 5.04 knoppix Slack91/10 freebsd51 vector4 redhat9
Posts: 304
Rep:
|
Depend on the load of traffic and purpose, but I guess it's better to have more ram in a server.
If you serve something like static pages on a small load environment. Try to use the 192Mb configuration first. Do not load X, it's unecessary on a server
|
|
|
08-14-2005, 12:29 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Pennsylvainia
Distribution: Slackware / Debian / *Ubuntu / Opensuse / Solaris uname: Brian Cooney
Posts: 503
Rep:
|
If you arent running X on the machine, you shouldnt break a sweat running web servers on thoes two boxes, even with only 128 megs of ram each.
a pentium 200 mmx with 64 megs of ram can saturate a t-1.
I have three multi-gigahertz boxes with a gig of ram each here, and I still use an old imac 233 with 48 megs of ram for my web server. The bottleneck is definatly my outbound bandwidth, not the speed of the machine.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|