I'm thinking of buying a pc maybe this year, with a view to NEVER having to upgrade, just replace parts. My last 2 boxes were laptops, the next is a desktop. Does anyone have any insights on this?
https://www.digitaltrends.com/comput...nm-2019-zen-2/
To me, as a hardware head, 7nm fab is a fairly important development. Back in the earliest days, there was 10^-6m (=10,000nm) fab, and chips were struggling to do 1Mhz. The fabrication improved by leaps and bounds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semico...ce_fabrication (This list, incidentally, doesn't tally exactly with wafer fab sizes as I read them from some datasheets over those decades).
Now it seems AMD has the jump on Intel in wafer fab, having use of 7nm plant. AMD traditionally made better use if it's traditionally larger wafer fab size in an effort to be competitive. It seems the leader in that race is about to change. AMD will be 7nm this year, and apparently Intel aren't there yet. With that inhouse expertise (optimizing a given fab size), AMD should have the jump on Intel.
The limit of achievable miniaturization appears to be 5nm. Things like Quantum effects, & molecule size make smaller fab unlikely. 7nm is a huge achievement in itself. If someone sneezes nearby, the consequences could be dire.
Ireland is well away from earthquake zones. Intel built Fab 14, a 64nm plant here in Newbridge, Ireland, and it made trash, until it was discovered the plant was being upset by micro-earthquakes. The solution was to dig a deep trench all around the plant to isolate it from these tremors. Entrance is now by bridge.