Laptop motherboard fits and boots but the screen is horizontally stretched by 200%
Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Laptop motherboard fits and boots but the screen is horizontally stretched by 200%
The screen stretching occurs as the BIOS screen is displayed and remains like that until kdm is loaded. The motherboard is of the same make as the laptop but a different model. All connectors fitted properly without necessitating the least of modifications.
Is it possible to correct this issue so that the screen is properly displayed without the stretching?
Am I correct when stating that the graphical terminal is stretched and the GUI is OK?
You mention Debian in your profile, if that is the distro used have a look at the following file: /etc/default/grub
Especially this part:
Quote:
# The resolution used on graphical terminal
# note that you can use only modes which your graphic card supports via VBE
# you can see them in real GRUB with the command `vbeinfo'
GRUB_GFXMODE=800x600
The BIOS screen is appearing overstretched by a factor of 200%. This behaviour continues when GRUB-PC boots, when the kernel boots and when kdm loads. Since this appears as soon as the BIOS takes control, I am concluding it has to do with the hardware of the display, the is, the GPU (integrated with the chipset) and the laptop display.
I rechecked the order confirmation email and verified that the laptop model is the one that I have - this motherboard should be the correct one because everything fitted properly. The only problem is the overstretched display.
When it powers on, it is set to 640x480. That's what the bios sets. Is that overstretched?
If not, does the stretch come in after grub loads, or the kernel?
The BIOS Setup Utility is stretched and the stretching persists even while kdm is running. I didn't load KDE because clearly the problem would also have persisted since kdm depends on X.
Because of this, I am trying to use the old motherboard which didn't exhibit this problem. I will attempt to override the problem by modifying the BIOS.
Fire away on the BIOS, but be sure to keep the old one, or get a copy.
I think the bios just sets a default mode - it shouldn't actually have to do that as a card should power up in a default mode of 640x480. It sounds like your default mode is 1024x or 1280x. It could be bios setting those modes. Here's the real test. Before you get into setup, it prints up some data about the box or video. Is that stretched?
Another possibility to consider is that there's a lot of eeprom in the chipsets configuring them. If the chipsets on the motherboard are [U]configured[U] differently, there's really nothing you can do about it.
10-12 years back, Via had this overly famous 'hardware fault' on large block copies in their PC chipsets. It was actually because manufacturers had tweaked the settings in the chips so the Creative Soundblaster would work. So we owners got utilities and suggestions to tweak them back for ourselves, on a purely "At Your Own Risk" basis from Via. I tried them, and they worked. But I didn't have to do much, because although I had an MPV3 southbridge, I didn't have the 'hardware fault'. It just cemented my opinion that VIA, and Creative, for that matter, were poor hardware.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.