Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
10-12-2008, 10:21 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Fedora,Solaris
Posts: 46
Rep:
|
is this hardware for home storage (NAS) ok? OS: latest centos or fedora
Hello to all
i would like to build a storage server for home usage.
and i need help choosing the right hardware.
some points:
1. 24/7 online
2. the box will be in the basement :-) with no monitor and keyboard...
only ssh/http/samba access to it
3. should be power saving
4. cheap as possible :-)
5. good I/O :-)
6. and fit in a relative small box (smaller than a desktop case)
7. software raid from OS
8. OS will be latest Centos or Fedora
clients that would connect via samba shares are:
2 windows boxes
1 linux box
1 htpc in the near future also :-)
most of the time the samba shares would be accessed to play
mp3/movies/pictures directly from the server...
the hardware at the moment:
CPU:
AMD le 1100 should use 45 watt i think
or
AMD Athlon 64 Model 3800+ also 45 watt + - usage
Hard Disks
Seagate 500GB 32mb buffer ST3500320AS
i was thinking getting 5 of this disks
so i would have 2.5 TB brutto.
after adding some raid to it maybe 2TB netto
MotherBoard
Gigabyte MA78GM-S2H AM2+
thanks for any help
Last edited by Yaniv-Fer; 10-12-2008 at 10:22 AM.
|
|
|
10-12-2008, 05:28 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,960
|
Hi,
You can look at ' FreeNAS'.
This link and others are available from ' Slackware-Links'. More than just SlackwareŽ links!
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 02:44 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Fedora,Solaris
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hello onebuck
what is the benefit if i install free nas?
free-nas is easy to manage but is it not better for me to just install centos and configure the 2 or 3 services that i need?
thanks
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 03:39 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,960
|
Hi,
Small footprint PC or older hardware using a OS that is specifically streamlined as Network Attached Storage. If you are just wanting to add storage to your OS then the load will be on that system instead of the NAS. The advantage of the NAS is the detached but network accessible storage media.
|
|
|
10-15-2008, 04:41 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, OpenSuse, Slack, Gentoo, Debian, Arch, PCBSD
Posts: 6,678
Rep:
|
Don't use Fedora for a server - it isn't supported for long enough. Go the CentOS route.
|
|
|
10-16-2008, 04:23 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Fedora,Solaris
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thank you all for your help
but what i still don't know if the hardware that i choose will be good enough for the task.
the OS can easy be replaced :-) but hardware is expansive and i don't have any money to waste.
will this hardware be good enough for the storage task? and power saving?
CPU:
AMD le 1100 should use 45 watt i think
or
AMD Athlon 64 Model 3800+ also 45 watt + - usage
Hard Disks
Seagate 500GB 32mb buffer ST3500320AS
i was thinking getting 5 of this disks
MotherBoard
Gigabyte MA78GM-S2H AM2+
thanks
|
|
|
10-16-2008, 06:19 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,960
|
Hi,
A little overkill with the hardware you have listed for a NAS. You could use a i486, P2/3 at a reduced cost an power consumption. As I stated you can use a discarded or retired PC, run headless therefore no video adapter, max the memory and remove any unnecessary equipment to lighten the load/power usage if desired.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|